TL;DR

  • The European Council has ended its adoption procedure for rules related to phones with replaceable batteries.
  • By 2027, all phones released in the EU must have a battery the user can easily replace with no tools or expertise.
  • The regulation intends to introduce a circular economy for batteries.
  • evo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing I haven’t seen mentioned is that this will inevitably make batteries smaller.

    If you are supposed to be able to open the phone and remove the battery manufacturers need to design a way to remove the cover, shield other components, create a compartment for the battery, and use sturdier batteries. All of those things take us space. Manufacturers aren’t just going to make phones thicker so that physical space has to be eaten by something… and it’s going to be the battery.

    I really liked having a removable battery on my phone 10 years ago in case I had a particularly long/intensive day. But now that I make it through a day without worry this could actually be sorta annoying.

    • Erich@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we are gonna get removable batteries there needs to be a standard battery format so that each company won’t have its own special battery design. One battery design for all devices. This way the battery will work in whichever phone you put it in.

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe so. A battery standard would specify the interface, not the actual battery design from a technical standpoint. It would specify:

          • size and shape, i.e. where connectors go, assuring it fits in a phone
          • voltage and amperage provided

          The rest is up to the battery manufacturer and is completely open to innovation. You want to put a Li-ion battery in there? Just make it the right shape and as long as it can provide the output required, it’s fine. Want some future-tech fusion battery? As long as it’s the right shape and puts out the required power!

    • Raikin@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I use a fairphone (with removable battery) and in a normal day it can go a whole day without going below 20%. And even if I don’t comsider ot too much of a hassle bringing an external battery for recharge with me when I know I’m gonna use it a lot or will not have time to recharge during the night.

      • Fritee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        To add, I think the batter capacity of a fairphone is 3905 mAh while eg Pixel 7 has 4355 so the diff is only ~10%

        If I can replace a battery without throwing away the phone, I’d definitely be OK with 10% battery reduction

    • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      sure, but we’re at a point with battery chemistry where that no longer really matters that much. the fairphone 4 is already at 3900 mAh and with both phone electronics constantly getting smaller and battery chemistry improving, it’s highly likely that this year’s fairphone 5 will not only crack the 4000 mAh barrier but fly past it. with a modern mid-range soc (which is really all you need to have a smooth experience outside of games) it’ more than enough to get you through the day with a good margin to spare. and that’s already a user-servicable design that no doubt guided eu legislature on this issue.