• 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          It follows rather directly. For it to be high treason to be against sending more military resources to Ukraine would mean that either the representatives are members of the Ukrainian government or, as was implied here, that Ukraine is a puppet state.

          It’s not high treason against the USA to be against the USA sending military resources to another country. You can only commit high treason against your own country.

          • McBinary@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can’t be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith.

            The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia…

            • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia…

              Which guess what: isn’t high treason. If you’ll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread.

              I was simply pointing out that using the term “high treason” here is rather silly and nonfactual.

          • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            As serving Russian interests, what kind of connection do they have to the Russian state if they so brazenly vote for the wishes of Putin?

            • agarorn@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is a new definition of treason for me, but okay call it what you want.

              Is a cooperation on space travel also treason?

              • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s a false equivalence, this isn’t exactly cooperation towards a mutually beneficial goal, this is just trying to reduce support for a country which by sheer coincidence is an enemy of Putin.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          your name is pacifist but you support sending weapons of death and destruction into a conflict where they will be used to kill people? they’re sending fucking clusterbombs dude what is it going to take to convince you people this is not a good thing?

          • haohao@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey, Ukrainian here. Try to convince me that it’s a bad thing. Russians shelling Ukrainian cities with cluster munitions is okay, but Ukraine fighting back is bad? Russia brought all the deaths and destruction, not Ukraine, or “the west”.

              • haohao@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                At least they have ~3% fail rate and will be used against military targets vs russian 30-40% fail rate and used in the cities

        • agarorn@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say that US citizens (the republican politicians) who do not support Ukraine should be trialed for treason. This implies that Ukraine is a part of the US, doesn’t it?