CucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoCostly rulelemm.eeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1568
arrow-up1568imageCostly rulelemm.eeCucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·2 years agoEh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoTurn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoReflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoReflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then
Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
Reflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
I know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then