• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    My point is you could change “Sea lion” to any minority, change the sea lion itself to that minority, and the comic does not lose all meaning. It can be interpreted as someone saying “I do not like (group)” and then being harassed by a member of that group while they repeatedly say nothing but “go away”. A racist could read this and think “Damn straight, I should be allowed to say I don’t like (race) without being harassed for it!”

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        With “pedophile” or “murderer” the evidence for them having done harm is self evident. In the comic the reasoning for disliking sea lions is not self evident, and the comic could be easily interpreted as “I should be allowed to say I don’t like any group I want and not have to defend myself.”

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just wanna say thanks for holding the torch here. You pretty much echoed any response I would’ve made if I’d had the time, but probably better XD Sorry you got the brunt of the hate.

    • kux@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      OK i think i understand you better, but still it seems a long stretch to me. a racist could read this and etc but so what? if he reads fables and decides that the tortoise represents this minority and the hare is that one his outlandish take does not indicate a problem in the original intention