My point it’s it could carry to a lot of psychological problems and social problems for the kids.

  • huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Daoism is sometimes considered a philosophy more than a religion. There is debate on whether it qualifies for the title religion at all.

    • WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is very much a religion. It has gods and goddesses, scripture, ritual practices, priests and monasteries. I know in the West there is some confusion, but mostly because Asian societies do not tend to make that divide.

      On the other hand, Doaism is not really dogmatic, so nobody really gives a shit if you believe in this god, that god, or none at all.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        From where I’m sitting, you just completely contradicted yourself.

        I find it concerning you seem so invested in it being considered a “religion”. Can we say persecution fetish??

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s where the question comes into play. The set of beliefs without requirements for worship make it a philosophy rather than a religion. A religion that does not require beliefs but rather suggests practical implementations doesn’t fit the same structure as the other major world religions.

        Anyway if your beliefs require indoctrination of children to believe in myths and legends as a coercive means of control it’s fucked.

        If it does exactly as you say above: it’s not a religion it’s a philosophy, because it does not use myths and legends as coercive means of control.