• tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    When you buy a lightbulb (at least here in the UK) it almost always still has the incandescent-equivalent on it as well as the actual wattage.

    People are still used to thinking in old terms that you want 100W for a ceiling lamp and 60W for a table lamp, for example.

    So this light in the fridge could be 200W equivalent but not actually 200W consumption.

    Thinking about it, lightbulb itself is at this point a ridiculously achronistic term, there’s nothing really ‘bulb’ about them anymore.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re right to be fair, a lot of them do retain that shape for purely aesthetic reasons, but it’s not a functional part of the light source any longer.

        • pfannkuchen_gesicht
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s functional in so far that it does protect the LED elements and makes the device better to handle.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            And sometimes acts as a diffuser for the light too, yeah. Just isn’t required for illumination purposes directly.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, they are just small diodes inside, if they have a bulb shape it’s just some plastic to have it be a familiar shape. I’d even argue most new light fixtures these days come in all sorts of shapes, and in my home, for example, I don’t even have a bulb shape.