He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    1·
    9 months ago

    And as he gets richer, he increases the amount of money he puts into his charity videos. Him having more money is pretty directly a good thing for those he helps. It’s also a good thing for him, but that’s not wrong.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        2·
        9 months ago

        “Hmm, I don’t have a good response to this. Let’s imply I simply have more intrinsic wisdom by assuming a false position of authority! That’ll show him!” - You

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          1·
          9 months ago

          You’re the one defending a millionaire. What more do I need to say?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            1·
            9 months ago

            I don’t know, something intelligent preferably. Make an actual point, don’t just jump to insulting people when you run out of things to say.

            Edit: I should practice what I preach. What makes millionaires bad? Their exploitation of other people to get to their position of wealth? Or just the act of having money? Surely it’s the former, which makes being a millionaire itself not an immoral act; it would depend on your method of gaining money?