He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

  • papertowels
    1·
    9 months ago

    Are you more likely to do x again if you got 100k for doing so vs nothing?

    We both know the answer to that.

    So does getting paid mean x gets done more often?

    Does that mean it’s better to be paid?