• jackpot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 months ago

    no i mean, by the people ‘who consider it’. i think the speaksr didnt understand that theyre saying it’s mankind others are talkint abkut

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh but the word mankind in itself overlooks women. We’re all supposed to be saying humankind now.

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        etymologically speaking im not even sure if thats right. i heard somethibg like this and they either said woman doesnt derive from man or that man used to mean woman and man but woman became its own thing, cant recall

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          “man” in the contexts not directly related to being a male, means human. “Man” used to have a prefix vaguely pronounced “were” and “woman” used to be “wifman”. Female werewolf would be a “wifwolf” then. So anyways, “Man” never changed it’s meaning, it really just gained an additional one, and yet again, whiners need to read a book.