• Xylight (Photon dev)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 year ago
    programs.librewolf = {
      enable = true;
      extensions = with pkgs.librewolf.extensions; [
        ublock-origin
        canvas-blocker
        wappalyzer
        user-agent-switcher
      ];
    };
    

    Declarative NixOS config. Copy this to your nixos config file to get my exact librewolf config.

    • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I’d never heard of librewolf until this. Why use it over firefox? Thought firefox was already privacy focused

      • @somnuz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Great! Keep digging, keep asking the right questions and ultimately you will just collect enough reasons to simply not use any other browser, until something even better will appear.

        Firefox is the Firefox we all really need and LibreWolf is the Firefox we deserve.

      • Xylight (Photon dev)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Firefox actually has a lot of telemetry that’s opt-out rather than opt-in, and doesn’t have many privacy protections. Librewolf comes with ublock origin (which blocks trackers and annoyances as well as ads), has extreme fingerprinting protection, and has no google stuff out of the box.

      • @CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Firefox has telemetry and has become adware. Mozilla VPN ads pop up every once in a while. Sponsored bullshit on the home screen. Pocket integration with recommended/sponsored content. Mozilla’s becoming what it set out to destroy unfortunately.

        LibreWolf is Firefox without this garbage, plus more privacy focused defaults. Some of those defaults are rather extreme though so I recommend toning it back (such as deleting history/cookies after every session, and resist fingerprinting can screw up anything that displays time by not taking your time zone into account).

    • torafugu
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Indeed. Linux is superior. Linux > Windows.

      I use Arch btw.

      • @MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        To see if the games with anticheat that you want to play are supported on linux, check areweanticheatyet.com they have a pretty huge list of anticheat status where are listed supported, unsupported and denied games.

      • @schmensch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        If your games are on Steam, check ProtonDB.

        If not, you’re probably out of luck, but check recent Search Engine results. Best to limit results to around last 6 months, otherwise you’ll probably get outdated information. Only a few bigger non-steam multiplayer shooters work, I can only think of Overwatch right now.

      • @mun_man@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Which games do you play? The only game holding me back was tarkov but I randomly decided to put Linux on one of my drives to see what I could/couldn’t do and I was able to get it working with proton. Probably going to switch over completely soon after I play around with it a bit more

      • @stappern
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • @shinobizilla@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      For work, I have no option other than Windows. Right now, I use a mix of WSL2, winget, scoop to get around which is nice. I get to ignore most of the rough edges of Windows lol

  • @Uniquitous
    link
    English
    211 year ago

    Well shit, now there’s nothing left for Edge to do.

    • @guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I liked the obsolete shim for that: cinst - save some letters.

      Same with cup instead of choco update.

      I’ve just reinstated them anyway.

    • Victron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Real. I just did that yesterday, uninstalled all that snap bullshit from kubuntu.

      • @kaitco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I honestly don’t understand why it’s a snap by default now. I’ve never got it to really function the way I want as a snap. Puts a sour taste in my mouth for Ubuntu altogether.

        • Victron
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The worse thing is that is not even available as a .deb anymore (or is pretty well hidden).

          • @Knusper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            You can download a .tar.bz2 from Mozilla’s webpage, which you can unpack and then just launch the firefox binary inside it.

            But yeah, if you want proper integration into the desktop environment, it takes some manual steps, which a .deb would do for you.

            • Programmer Belch
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If you are willing to download a .tar.bz2 from Mozilla, you can also download the .deb file from the Debian repos

              • @Knusper@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Yeah, sure. I still like to share this factoid, because not many people seem to be aware and it is pretty useful, if e.g. you want to quickly test Firefox Nightly or the new Thunderbird or whatever.

        • @Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yeah, as far as I can tell, when you right-click on an image and select “Save As…”, that’s just flat out broken on Ubuntu 22.04, due to it being shipped as a Snap.

          And the Download-folder it uses, is in some random, deeply nested sub-directory of ~/snap/.

            • @Knusper@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Yeah, Firefox even integrated this whole “desktop portal” concept, specifically for the file dialogs within containerized package formats.
              No idea, why Canonical and/or Mozilla don’t have that working for Snaps…

        • AggressivelyPassive
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Especially since snaps cause tons of problems, for some reason. I actually switched to Debian a while ago because the snap Firefox kept randomly forgetting history items, cookies, settings, etc.

          • Semmelstulle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Actually the non GUI Snaps are good. I still prefer not to use snaps but they are well done. It’s just the software for the average user that starts to suck on Ubuntu. Their focus silently shifted to cloud and server, not desktop. And it shows

            • AggressivelyPassive
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              But why release it then? And with Firefox? I mean, if some weird niche application threw some errors under certain circumstances, fine, you can’t test everything. But Firefox? I mean, OSes are just browser-enablers these days and if Ubuntu sucks at this very basic thing, it’s garbage.

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yep. I removed the snap and installed it from tarball. Automatic updates don’t work quite right so I just wrote a bash script that runs the update process for me.