• Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s worse than you thought.

    The webmail provider released a dedicated browser that can only open the webmail and called it a “desktop” app.

    Additionally, they don’t support IMAP. There’s an app to run on your computer that becomes a bridge. The proprietary protocol is translated to IMAP. You can’t use your favorite client if your operating system can’t run that bridge and you’re not a premium user because for “reasons” only premium users can run that local bridge

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      they don’t support IMAP

      They don’t support IMAP because they want emails to remain end-to-end encrypted, and IMAP doesn’t have any way of doing that. The gateway decrypts the emails locally, then serves them as plain text.

      We need something better than IMAP, that’s designed for modern use cases. Something that’s not stateful… Maybe a web service or something like that. JMAP seems promising but barely any providers have implemented it.

      • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Still, if an user prefers the convenience of using any client instead of e2e, could enable it in a setting. Maybe the user subscribed because they liked the interface and the overall features of the plan, and not because of the encrypted email solution and just wants to add the account on the mobile client instead of a dedicated app

        Being closed like this IMHO is just to increase user retention

        • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If thex subscribed because of the interface (ehich is certainly plausible), what would they need IMAP support for? Also, if you really want IMAP, xou can have it, you just need their (open source) Proton Bridge for it (thats a sofrware) so that ut retains all features. But then I would need my own email client.

          • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            On mobile you’re forced to use their “open source” app that is only available on the closed source app stores and not on fdroid because it uses Google push services

            • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not true, it’s been available on Fdroid for quite some time now. And it doesn’t need play services for the notifications to work either.

              • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                It’s available on an unofficial repository that can be optionally added to fdroid, it’s not available on fdroid

                • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Even so, your statement that it is only available on closed-source app stores is wrong. And it doesn’t even matter that it’s not provided by “My First F-Droid Repo Demo” (yes, that’d the name of the official repo). Many open source apps are on IzzyOnDroid, including Jerboa, what do you use to write on Lemmy?

                  Either way, your original comment is completely wrong and it doesnt help that it’s “only” available in the most popular extra repo.

        • sajran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          E2E is their flagship feature and pretty much only selling point. I’m really not surprised they don’t allow to just disable it.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      On a lighter note, the protocol might be proprietary but the bridge still seems to be fully open source : https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge

      I don’t think think Proton shows bad will on this one. The only alternative I can think of (as a non expert) would be IMAP + GPG encrypted emails but very few desktop clients support GPG, which would make them less accessible 🤷‍♂️ Having their own protocol also probably makes it much much easier for them to iterate on it, opening up usually makes think much robust but also slower.