• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Who cares about an extra loan payment if you aren’t the one paying it.

    This all stems from someone claiming an empty property still generated profit. You seem to be arguing that if someone else is paying your mortgage (i.e. a renter) then you can profit by borrowing against the equity in the property. I agree with you, but I don’t see the sense in borrowing against an empty place as you are just giving some of your profits to the lender.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The benefit of the ability to borrow against it comes from being able to take part in other investment opportunities. Someone has a company they are starting, you can take a mortgage to invest in it and a year later potentially pay off the mortgage (depending on the size) and it can be empty or not. There are other financial vehicles that have a similar pattern. Even taking a mortgage on a property to take advantage of stock shorting or w/e.