The issue will continue until the underlying causes are addressed. Prevent corporations from buying property by taxing the absolute hell out of third+ homes and taxing if unoccupied. Housing is a necessity, not a commodity and should be treated accordingly.
No, you can’t - all you can do is hide it or push it elsewhere. So long as the cost of living makes life unbearable, drug use will continue : it’s a symptom of stress, alienation, and a lack of opportunities
If that was the case then we’d have 0 issues if we just gave people a home and that’s bullshit. I don’t doubt these things are incredibly linked but they are still issues that can be addressed separately. I don’t doubt there are a ton of people who given the right opportunity could get themselves going again but there are also folks who won’t change themselves. I understand drug addiction is hard but that doesn’t change the fact that plenty of addicts will not change their habits unless forced, so what do you do with them once you’ve given them a place to live? It’s ok to continue an addiction in private? They just magically change their outlook and seek out assistance? That’s probably true for a chunk of folks but certainly leaves many out.
I don’t think housing can “solve” drug addiction. However, there are factors that have been shown to contribute to addiction from homelessness. Less stability, regular trauma, mental health, etc causes all of these things to interact and exasperate each other.
The frustrating part is that voters keep telling the city, county, and state to invest in all of these areas. Measure 110 was supposed to create more space to have drug addiction treated, and there was no follow through. Now, further existing infrastructure is closing with no replacement. Similarly with housing, voters overwhelmingly keep calling for housing solutions, but any progress turns into new vendor procurement, deals with developers that don’t follow through, and half baked plans that don’t materialize.
Also, I think it’s important to remember that a lot of drug addiction happens amongst the housed. We just don’t see it. But as our coworker who is struggling falls apart, loses their job, and times get tough the more likely they will be the one moving from pain pills at home to fentanyl in the streets.
I’m glad some of the electeds are at least acting like they are as frustrated as I am. I hope they actually do something about it. (thought the need for national reform on both housing and drug addiction also can’t be ignored).
The issue will continue until the underlying causes are addressed. Prevent corporations from buying property by taxing the absolute hell out of third+ homes and taxing if unoccupied. Housing is a necessity, not a commodity and should be treated accordingly.
A lack of housing isn’t the problem. Portland has a residential vacancy rate of 6%, just about normal and 0.7% under the national average.
https://portlandrentalhomes.com/calculate-your-vacancy-rate-to-determine-your-rental-propertys-overall-health/
The problem is people out of their minds on booze and drugs can’t hold a job long enough to pay for ANY housing.
You can solve the drug problem without solving the housing issues.
No, you can’t - all you can do is hide it or push it elsewhere. So long as the cost of living makes life unbearable, drug use will continue : it’s a symptom of stress, alienation, and a lack of opportunities
If that was the case then we’d have 0 issues if we just gave people a home and that’s bullshit. I don’t doubt these things are incredibly linked but they are still issues that can be addressed separately. I don’t doubt there are a ton of people who given the right opportunity could get themselves going again but there are also folks who won’t change themselves. I understand drug addiction is hard but that doesn’t change the fact that plenty of addicts will not change their habits unless forced, so what do you do with them once you’ve given them a place to live? It’s ok to continue an addiction in private? They just magically change their outlook and seek out assistance? That’s probably true for a chunk of folks but certainly leaves many out.
How does housing solve drug addiction?
I don’t think housing can “solve” drug addiction. However, there are factors that have been shown to contribute to addiction from homelessness. Less stability, regular trauma, mental health, etc causes all of these things to interact and exasperate each other.
The frustrating part is that voters keep telling the city, county, and state to invest in all of these areas. Measure 110 was supposed to create more space to have drug addiction treated, and there was no follow through. Now, further existing infrastructure is closing with no replacement. Similarly with housing, voters overwhelmingly keep calling for housing solutions, but any progress turns into new vendor procurement, deals with developers that don’t follow through, and half baked plans that don’t materialize.
Also, I think it’s important to remember that a lot of drug addiction happens amongst the housed. We just don’t see it. But as our coworker who is struggling falls apart, loses their job, and times get tough the more likely they will be the one moving from pain pills at home to fentanyl in the streets.
I’m glad some of the electeds are at least acting like they are as frustrated as I am. I hope they actually do something about it. (thought the need for national reform on both housing and drug addiction also can’t be ignored).