Spain has banned Telegram.

They are claiming this is over copyright violations of users, that Telegram is failing to police. Now some users will be forced to consider decentralized solutions. As I have repeated many times, Session messenger empowers users to defy state level censorship, with its unique blockchain based DNS that completely separates physical locations from identity. And our team has repeatedly mentioned using Session to defy a Monero ban.

With Session, if the location of the VPS or device is discovered, the user can rotate the blockchain name to a new public key. On the other hand, SimpleX, Tor Onions, or XMPP are tied to physical devices with encryption keys in memory, and their discovery is a game-over.

However, Session receives a lot of criticism. Rather than ignore this, I tackle it head on, https://simplifiedprivacy.com/spain-has-banned-telegram-defending-session/

Tor Browser Onion: http://privacypkybrxebcjicfhgwsb3coatqechwnc5xow4udxwa6jemylmyd.onion/spain-has-banned-telegram-defending-session/

  • tusker@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, if you are using the same account to talk to your grandma as to buy and sell 10K XMR then you may have a problem, but you would most likely be OK anyway.

    I would like to see Matrix over Tor or I2P this would solve any DMS issues.

    • SummerBreeze@monero.townOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m asking you to consider this technology beyond just evasion. It’s a distribution system for content.

      Matrix is tied to one server. Federation is physical locations. Yeah you can hide those locations with Tor or I2P, but ultimately if that location is found its game over. With a blockchain based and node based system, its full blown crypto anarchy. You can establish a reputation that can’t be taken away.

      The same way we value XMR for it’s self-custody of money, as opposed to btc lightning that ties it to a liquidity server. That same logic, is now why self-custody of communication is greater than “federated liquidity hiding”

      • tusker@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I see what you are saying. Once we have the usability and feature set of matrix with a blockchain based decentralized solution I am 100% in. 👍

        • VolunTerry@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Awesome discussion! I see better solutions on the horizon with back and forth like this here. A willingness to adopt better tech as it is developed will be critical. Monero doesn’t stagnate in its development and neither should our communication and distribution platforms.