• 🌴 𝓣𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    Most corporate communications are unnecessarily fluffy to begin with because it makes it look like more work was done. Most of the time I don’t even understand why I’m explaining something and it feels like the only requirement is to have words on a page.

    • @xantoxis
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Sometimes the only requirement IS to have words on a page. Think about a disaster recovery plan, for example. Now, you probably don’t want an LLM to write your disaster recovery plan, but it’s a perfect example of something where the main value is that you wrote it down, and now you can be certified that you have one.

      • 🌴 𝓣𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I just asked GPT to create a disaster recovery plan for a ransomware attack, and actually the information it gave wasn’t wrong or bad. But it’s also very generic, and it will rarely/never tell you correctly the specifics to your applications or where to click.

        • @xantoxis
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • Rose Thorne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        “Didja hear, Jeff had a heart attack.”

        “Wait… Jeff was a real person this entire time?”

  • redcalcium
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Something is wrong, why do AIs get to spend all their time writing and painting while we have to go to work every day?

  • @xantoxis
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    This is a legitimate use case for LLM, though.

    Not everyone can communicate clearly. Not everyone can summarize well. So the panel on the right is great for the people on the other end, who must read your poorly-communicated thoughts.

    At the same time, some things must look like you put careful thought and time into your words. Hence, the panel on the left.

    And if people on both sides are using the tool to do this, who’s really hurt by that?

    • @hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Yes, but there is a real risk here that either the expansion added false details or the summary is wrong, especially the summary.

      • @xantoxis
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It’s not about formality. It is about the introduction of error. Less strict communication is more likely to have such errors introduced.