GreyShuck@feddit.uk to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 2年前Conservatives set for worst election result yet, research showswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1205 cross-posted to: unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
arrow-up1205external-linkConservatives set for worst election result yet, research showswww.theguardian.comGreyShuck@feddit.uk to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 2年前message-square41fedilink cross-posted to: unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2年前That why Mixed PR, or even better Ranked Mixed PR, would be an easier switch, as well a better system than pure PR.
minus-squareLogi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2年前What is why what? There is no claim in the post you’re responding to. Only questions.
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前With PR you lose local MPs. With Mixed Member PR, you keep local MPs. Using rank/score voting, improves that local representation.
That why Mixed PR, or even better Ranked Mixed PR, would be an easier switch, as well a better system than pure PR.
What is why what? There is no claim in the post you’re responding to. Only questions.
With PR you lose local MPs. With Mixed Member PR, you keep local MPs. Using rank/score voting, improves that local representation.