• APassenger
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying to do something other than voting. I’m saying you keep framing this like that’s the only thing when they could do more.

    Voting is not the only option. It’s a good one, but we have more/additonal.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You made all that up. I never said nor implied it was the only thing you can do. But you should do it as it’s the most effective thing you can do.

      • APassenger
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’ve done it here, you’re doing it in others threads.

        Instead of telling them to vote for a candidate they barely believe in, why not recommend they find candidates they like, locally, state, etc and help them. But then in general elections, vote for someone who can win.

        It’s an entire extra sentence that takes less time than calling them whiny.

        You’re boiling the options down to a suck ass, “eat your dinner” message and if you want to prevent rightward movement, I think calls to action are better.

        We move things to the correct position by having candidates that make a compelling case for why this (waves around) isn’t working. Then voting for what we got when we must.

        Edit: it is NOT the most effective thing to do. Getting additional people to vote is more effective than standing in line individually like a dumb ass and saying, “this is the best I can do.” You can do more than that.