fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前this one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up11.37K
arrow-up11.37Kimagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square306fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 年前Hahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 年前Well, it’s a classic. Now look at this: communism sounds good but it’s impossible in practice opens umbrella
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前They make bulletproof umbrellas now?
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前It’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前It’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice. The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Is that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
minus-squareMetaCubed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 年前You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-squareUnderwaterSwift@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
Hahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
Well, it’s a classic. Now look at this:
opens umbrella
They make bulletproof umbrellas now?
It’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
It’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice.
The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
Is that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
I dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right