fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up11.37K
arrow-up11.37Kimagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square306fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoHahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 years agoWell, it’s a classic. Now look at this: communism sounds good but it’s impossible in practice opens umbrella
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoThey make bulletproof umbrellas now?
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIt’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIt’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice. The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIs that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
minus-squareMetaCubed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoThere are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoGood things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-squareUnderwaterSwift@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
Hahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
Well, it’s a classic. Now look at this:
opens umbrella
They make bulletproof umbrellas now?
It’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
It’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice.
The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
Is that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
I dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right