fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up11.37K
arrow-up11.37Kimagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square306fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoHahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·8 months agoWell, it’s a classic. Now look at this: communism sounds good but it’s impossible in practice opens umbrella
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 months agoThey make bulletproof umbrellas now?
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoIt’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoIt’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice. The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoIs that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
minus-squareMetaCubed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 months agoThere are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoGood things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-squareUnderwaterSwift@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
Hahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
Well, it’s a classic. Now look at this:
opens umbrella
They make bulletproof umbrellas now?
It’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
It’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice.
The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
Is that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
I dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right