Bankenstein@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoXKCD 1172feddit.deimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up184
arrow-up184imageXKCD 1172feddit.deBankenstein@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squarehannes3120@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoExcel wrongly assuming the year 1900 was a leap year for their timestamps is my favorite bug that will never be fixed because everyone has built workarounds for this already
minus-squaretjhart85@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoDidn’t they do that intentionally to be compatible with Lotus 123?
minus-squaretjhart85@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThanks for backing me up :-) A link from MS as well, backing us up :-)
Excel wrongly assuming the year 1900 was a leap year for their timestamps is my favorite bug that will never be fixed because everyone has built workarounds for this already
Didn’t they do that intentionally to be compatible with Lotus 123?
they did
Thanks for backing me up :-)
A link from MS as well, backing us up :-)