• Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    You should replace that thing with something more modern. I had a 5000p chipset system someone gave me with dual quad cores and an assload of ram.

    The shitty box idled over 400W. I went as far as getting low power ram and the newest CPU it would support that also supported frequency and power scaling and it still used over 400W on idle.

    This while I had a Xeon E5 box that was only a few years younger that uses more in the neighborhood of 50W on idle and utterly decimates the 5000 series box in CPU performance.

    You’re probably better of fetching some old Ryzen 1800x system of ebay for higher performance and leagues lower power consumption.

    As for the raid, don’t use it. Hardware raid has always been shit and in modern Linux and Windows is as good as completely depricated.

    • Krafting@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re missing the point, it’s not about using old hardware to daily drive them here, it’s for the fun and thrill of discovering ancient hardware, software and technologies! I’ll definitly need to see how much power this one is taking tho, but with only 1 out of 2 CPU I’d say around 200W for something this old

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have a HP Proliant DL380G7, basically the last server with a front side bus, and all the comments about it where about power per watt.

        and they’re not wrong.

        I just don’t think this is the community for old servers like this, self hosting is very much a practical consideration and the money spent on electricity running anything useful on these old things is better spent on a raspberry pi or stand alone NAS or something.

        • Krafting@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          In my opinion, selfhosting is also about discovering how (and what) you could selfhost with old hardware and OS, just for fun and understanding a bit more about the history of hardware

          But yeah for 24/7 services I have others way more modern servers and also an OrangePi

      • Endorkend@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh, I get it. But a baseline HP Proliant from that era is just an x86 system barely different from a desktop today but worse/slower/more power hungry in every respect.

        For history and “how things changed”, go for something like a Sun Fire system from the mid 2000’s (280R or V240 are relatively easy and cheap to get and are actually different) or a Proliant from the mid to late 90’s (I have a functioning Compaq Proliant 7000 which is HUGE and a puzzlebox inside).

        x86 computers haven’t changed much at all in the past 20 years and you need to go into the rarer models (like blade systems) to see an actual deviation from the basic PC alike form factor we’ve been using for the past 20 years and unique approaches to storage and performance.

        For self hosting, just use something more recent that falls within your priceclass (usually 5-6 years old becomes highly affordable). Even a Pi is going to trounce a system that old and actually has a different form factor.

        • Krafting@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I would love to actually get my hand on some Sun gear, they look really cool! Or even some Itanium powered servers! This one is an IBM server that I got for free, and exploring the software to use it, is a bit of a challenge and it is pretty different from how you configure server nowadays. (Also, a floppy drive on a server, this is what I call awesome!)

          For selfhosting real stuff, I do have modern gear and an OrangePi too!

        • Krafting@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I also looked up the Compaq ProLiant 7000, and this thing is huge indeed, but it does look awesome!

          • Endorkend@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            They have a secondary motherboard that hosts the Slot CPUs, 4 single core P3 Xeons. I also have the Dell equivalent model but it has a bum mainboard.

            With those 90’s systems, to get Windows NT to use more than 1 core, you have to get the appropriate Windows version that actually supports them.

            Now you can simply upgrade from a 1 to a 32 core CPU and Windows and Linux will pick up the difference and run with it.

            In the NT 3.5 and 4 days, you actually had to either do a full reinstall or swap out several parts of the Kernel to get it to work.

            Downgrading took the same effort as a multicore windows Kernel ran really badly on a single core system.

            As for the Sun Fires, the two models I mentioned tend to be highly available on Ebay in the 100-200 range and are very different inside than an X86 system. You can go for 400 or higher series to get even more difference, but getting a complete one of those can be a challenge.

            And yes, the software used on some of these older systems was a challenge in itself, but they aren’t really special, they are pretty much like having different vendors RGB controller softwares on your system, a nuisance that you should try to get past.

            For instance, the IBM 5000 series raid cards were simply LSI cards with an IBM branded firmware.

            The first thing most people do is put the actual LSI firmware on them so they run decently.