• booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    I did not even click the link because it’s obvious on its face that it’s bullshit anti-china propaganda in like 7 different ways. My comment is essentially a steel-man argument: Even if I assume that the liberal bullshit propaganda is 100% true, the US is still far worse in every way.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah, makes sense. I’d look more at the U.S. drone assassination program and its (actual) kidnapping and torture operations. That’s the best comparison to what this report alleges.

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, I don’t appreciate the implication that the time I was in the wrong place at the wrong time so I got forced into the back of a stranger’s car at gunpoint and driven 30 minutes to the stranger’s HQ where I was then locked in a room and interrogated doesn’t count as “abduction” or “kidnapping”

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I mean, that wasn’t an abuction or kidnapping. There are countless actions that are legal when the government does them but criminal if done by a private citizen. In many cases there’s probable cause to make an arrest, but the person is later cleared, which sounds like it happened to you. That doesn’t make the arrest illegal, much less kidnapping.

          This isn’t a technical point, either. Mischaracterizing lawful government conduct as criminal is exactly what this report is attempting to do, and we shouldn’t do it ourselves.

          • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean, that wasn’t an abuction or kidnapping.

            It was exactly both of those things, and I don’t understand why you are the second person to reply to me under the mistaken impression that abduction and kidnapping are only possible when they are done illegally. Where are you getting this nonsense from?

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Where are you getting this nonsense from?

              The law. Yes, abduction and kidnapping are only possible when they are done illegally. Illegality is a crucial part of what those terms mean.

              You’re essentially making the libertarian “tax is theft” argument: it would be criminal if I did it to you, so it must be criminal when the government does it to you.

              • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Illegality is a crucial part of what those terms mean.

                No dude, it isn’t. At all. You literally have it backwards. The law uses these terms because they are English terms with meanings. The law doesn’t give them their meanings.

                  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    There is no legal way to kidnap someone.

                    There are a wide variety of legal ways to kidnap someone. Such as the one I described which happened to me.