Hiringa, with partners fuel supplier Waitomo Group and Australasia’s largest heavy vehicle fleet owner TR Group, on Tuesday opened three green hydrogen stations, with a fourth under way, within the North Island’s economic “golden triangle” of freight movement.

    • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, as I said above, this is true because a) hydrogen doesn’t currently have the scale to bring the cost down, and b) is more suitable for large vehicles anyway. It’s failure to be a viable consumer option doesn’t mean it wouldn’t work in mass freight transport.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Spending longer filling up than an EV because the pump keeps freezing up, and $200 USD to do so, isn’t an issue of scale.

        • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Of course it is, don’t be daft.

          Price will come down with scale. Currently hydrogen is only produced at a very small scale. As production increases, price will drop. Simple really.

          Freezing pumps is a problem I’m certain will be solved. In its infancy, EV charging stations were slow. Look how far the technology has come in a short number of years. As uptake increases and infrastructure is built, I am certain these problems will be overcome.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            They won’t, because EVs will always be the better option, and the niche applications where an EV simply isn’t viable will be served by biofuels rather than hydrogen. It’s a mongrel of a product to manufacture, store, transport, and transfer into the vehicle, whereas liquid fuels can be stored in a fuel can, and transported by every means of transport known to man.

            Hydrogen has been the fuel of the future for the last fifty years, and it’s still not a viable option.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              EVs won’t, because internal combustion cars will always be the better options, and the niche applications where ICE simply isn’t viable will be served by bunker fuel rather than EVs. It’s a mongrel of a product to manufacture, store, transport and charge the vehicle, wheras liquid fuels can be stored in a fuel can, and transported by every means of transport known to man.

              EVs have been the propulsion of the future for the last fifty years, and it’s still not a viable option.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                This is true if you completely ignore the cost of running a combustion engine vehicle, or the fact that EVs have improved hugely even over the last ten years.

                • Maalus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  This is true because you wrote a bunch of nothingburgers about EVs being better than hydrogen where those EVs were in the same space barely 10yrs ago that hydrogen is now.

            • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It is technically challenging, I don’t disagree, but it has high energy density by weight. It also, of course, has lots of other applications. Steel manufacture being one.

              But to be honest, even if it never eventuates and we get carbon neutral biofuels, I’ll be happy. Anything is better than what we’re doing right now.