• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Actually if “windows” is “cars” and linux is “trains,” ditching windows for linux is more like selling your car in NYC and taking the subway instead because while it is less glamorous it actually works better to get you around the city and you don’t have to worry about all the extra bullshit like paying for or finding parking.

    • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That analogy fails, because a full 32 percent of New Yorkers take the subway for their commute, whereas about 1-4 percent of people use Linux.

      Go ahead and say “well, that’s because a lot of people are stupid sheep.” Doesn’t really matter. The fact is, Linux has been “just about to take over the desktop OS market and leave all these commercial-software-loving Wintel Box users in the dust” for almost as long as we’ve been waiting for nuclear fusion.

      And it actually looks like we MIGHT get fusion power, before Linux can break 6 percent (edit: wait, if you count ChromeOS, I guess it broke 6 percent, at some point. I don’t know if you count ChromeOS, though. I kinda don’t, because of how much it relies on cloud shit)

      If any non-windows PC-compatible operating system had ever put together a 32 percent market share, that would have made EVERYTHING better, because it would have been placing market pressure on Microsoft. They wouldn’t be able to pull bullshit stunts like we’ve been talking about.

      But Linux could never actually get enough users. It just wasn’t ever meant to be.

      EDIT: I actually had my numbers wrong. 32 percent is the number of commuters who use the subway to get INTO New York City, for their daily commute. Apparently, A FULL 55 PERCENT OF ACTUAL NEW YORK RESIDENTS say they use the subway as their primary mode of transportation, inside the city.

      So, again, the analogy simply cannot hold. Linux will never have 55 percent of the userbase.

      You probably think it should have 55 percent. And that’s fine. But a bunch of could’ves, should’ves, and would’ves taped to a $10 bill are worth one picture of Alexander Hamilton, and not much else.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It isn’t about % of users lol, that’s a fight you’re having with yourself, and now I’m wondering if you think the % of people who use their own home-built trains to get around is comparable to the % of linux users. It’s about user experience. Sure, if you NEED your car to go offroading the subway may not be the best option, same as if you NEED to play Destiny 2 you may not want to use linux, but for most people who just want to get around the city the subway is the best option, even for the people who moved from out of state and are used to their car so they don’t utilize the trains. For most people who just want to browse the internet (or a myriad of other non-windows-exclusive programs), linux is actually better than windows, even if those people are used to the OS that ships with their computer.

        Analogy holds up.

        Oh! And Tl;dr, jfc my guy.

        • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Recompiling your OS kernel: “I’ll do that shit, sure. It’ll make me feel SO MUCH SMARTER than those WintelBox Sheep.”

          Reading about 300 words: “Nah, too long.”

          EDIT: Also, you say it’s not about % of users, but that really is just your opinion. Things WOULD be a lot different, if there were significantly more Linux users. I won’t bother to elaborate on how exactly I think things would be different, because I realize you don’t like reading.