• M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As someone who has shot this round, no I don’t think I am overestimating the penetration. Also as it turns out police (I think state troopers in this case) snipers operate at ranges of 100 yards or less according to the police https://www.police1.com/swat/articles/a-first-of-its-kind-effort-describes-police-sniper-use-of-force-engagements-in-us-j7JjrYjYZmPtsoMt/. I know of no way to magic a bullet fired into a crowd to not over penetrate and yes I checked if there was some sort of less lethal or low pen police round (I found none).

    Know your target and what is beyond it. This is basic firearm safety, but that seems to not be common in the US of A.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There are a million low pen rounds, they’re called expanding hollow points or fracturing rounds. They are designed to dump all their energy in soft targets, they are ubiquitous in hunting.

      (And practically everyone has fired a 308 or equivalent, 300 win mag they are not)

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Funny you should compare the round I am assuming they are using (just went with the current most common police rifle) to a 308 but not a 300 win mag. They use both the 308 and the 7.62x51 NATO from what I can look up.

        The 7.62x51 nato has more punch then a 308 and a bit less vilocity then a 300 win mag. Now if you where to compare it to a 30-06 or a 7.62x54R then yeah sure. The point is the police are not using anything more fancy then hollowpoint according to what little I can find https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/doc/documents/policy/section-04/040106aa.pdf and I don’t know any even slightly competent shooter (hunters more so) that would take the risk of that hollowpoint stopping at the first target with a 308 or hell even a .223.

        I think we are getting lost in the weeds but my point is you don’t set up sniper teams to protect people, you set them up to take people out or intimidate.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          You absolutely set up sniper teams to protect people, such as every US president in a long time and most major sports games. Obviously there is a risk in taking someone out like that and that risk is weighed before giving an order to fire. And I’m not comparing 308 to 7.62x51NATO arbitrarily, they are virtually identical rounds like 5.56 and .223

    • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Welp, thankfully you have a very easy way to identify if you’re right or if you’re wrong.

      If you wake up tomorrow morning and 24h news cycles are megaphoning the murder of innocent protestors, you were right.

      If nothing happens, you’ll learn you were wrong, and hopefully you’ll learn from it.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        If nothing happens, you’ll learn you were wrong, and hopefully you’ll learn from it.

        How does this make me wrong? All I see is 40ish arrests so far and unless they save the day with some sniper shot my point still stands. I am not sure how you think if the police don’t kill people somehow that is an own. This is not a rational response to a protest unless you are in a place with very poor civil unrest or one that is not very free.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Looks like they just grabbed them. I was reading it might be the biggest mass protester arrest since the Vietnam era, but I am waiting for the final picture.