• ExpensiveConstant@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I blame the rise of frameworks, libraries, and IDEs. It’s easier for someone who knows nothing to throw some software together and ship it.

    I very much disagree with this. Yes to an extent you don’t need to know as much as you might have in the past but if we had to constantly reinvent the wheel, I don’t think we would have nearly as many people entering/remaining in this field. Additionally well written frameworks and libraries can actually make your code safer since you don’t have to reinvent the wheel and discover the pitfalls all over again. IDEs are also a net positive IMO. Errors next to the line of code that caused them, breakpoints, interactive debugging. These are all things I personally would find hard to live without. Necessities? Technically no. But good god do I not want to have to read build output unless necessary.

    • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can only hobble along with tool support, you never understood what you were doing. You don’t have to rewrite everything from scratch, but if you can’t, you lack the skills to use them effectively, and can’t ever improve on them. And like I say, soon AI will replace those consumers.

      Compilers are perfectly able to tell you the line of an error, you can use a debugger without the IDE, I run lldb or the Chez Scheme debugger all the time, but I understand what the tool’s doing.

    • balp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A good IDE also helps you make better refactoring, making the code so much easier to read. The main goal of any code.