• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    obsidian agreed to the 18 month timeframe, which for a team like them should have been enough time given they had all of bethesda’s resources at hand and didnt need to create a whole lot of the assets

    Sorry, but you must not be very familiar with game development to think that a mere 18 months would be enough time to churn out a AAA game. It needed 2-2.5 years at least.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      new vegas was a larger dlc rather a AAA game. and if it needed 2.5 years at the least then go ask obsidian why they didnt ask for a little more time. they obviously were able to deliver a game in 18 months, but they yet again went too far and mismanaged their time resulting in unfinished legion quests and the buggiest launch maybe ever

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        at the least then go ask obsidian why they didnt ask for a little more time.

        You want Obsidian to ask the guys who would eventually stiff them over a single MetaCritic score point to give them more time? Obviously, there was a rather hostile relationship between the two.

        • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          it was so hostile in fact that pretty much every dev at obsidian has had nothing but nice things to say about bethesda. so hostile that josh sawyer praised being able to work with creation engine

          and bethesda didnt stiff them zenimax did, so it was something bethesda didnt really have control over. but then again, maybe obsidian could have not released a game THAT buggy and they would have gotten that bonus