MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 年前Writing C++ is easy.sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1985
arrow-up1985imageWriting C++ is easy.sh.itjust.worksMaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 年前message-square80fedilink
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 年前Clearly, you haven’t gcc & gdb…
minus-squareeupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 年前I love gcc but it can’t make nested template errors any less horrifying
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前I would say that joke only works with template bugs, normally gcc gives fairly good directions.
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareeupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 年前If it were up to me I’d be avoiding templates altogether. Sadly, I don’t get that choice with 3rd party code.
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareeupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 年前Do you know who ate all the function candidates?
Clearly, you haven’t gcc & gdb…
I love gcc but it can’t make nested template errors any less horrifying
I would say that joke only works with template bugs, normally gcc gives fairly good directions.
deleted by creator
If it were up to me I’d be avoiding templates altogether. Sadly, I don’t get that choice with 3rd party code.
deleted by creator
Do you know who ate all the function candidates?