• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Anything that easy isn’t going to do anything. If you want actual security you would have to spend a lot of money for very little chance it would work

    • akakunai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Uh, no. Almost everything you can do for logical security only requires free software. Something as easy as ticking the box “encrypt my drive” and putting in a good password when installing Ubuntu or whatever is about as easy as it gets and is LUKS2 (“actual security”, as far as at-rest data encryption is concerned).

    • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why did you feel the need to come into this thread and broadcast your opinion on something you know nothing about? Encryption is not made any less effective just because people made free tools to implement it easily.

      It’s just math. It’s not a finite resource, and there isn’t “premium math” you have to go buy at the math store to make your encryption stronger.

    • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think what you’re driving at is partially true: for perfect security, it takes a lot of effort and you never know when there’s a zero day for your particular practice.

      However, like the other commenter is saying, it’s easy to have better security than most. Heck, it don’t even require extra ongoing maintenance to have a healthy security coverage.

      But not doing anything to increase your security is a bad choice. To me, it’s kind of like eating vegetables, if the average person would just do it a little more, we would all benefit.