This is the Discord FAQ archive, I recommend reading all of it https://lemmy.ca/post/20577314


**Steam Announcement 5/2/24 **

This announces the return of PSN forced logins

“Due to technical issues at the launch of HELLDIVERS™ 2, we allowed the linking requirements for Steam accounts to a PlayStation Network account to be temporarily optional. That grace period will now expire. See details below in this post.

Account linking plays a critical role in protecting our players and upholding the values of safety and security provided on PlayStation and PlayStation Studios games. This is our main way to protect players from griefing and abuse by enabling the banning of players that engage in that type of behaviour. It also allows those players that have been banned the right to appeal.”


**Playstation Announcement 5/5/24 **

Backing out the PSN account changes, some corpo BS basically

"Helldivers fans—we’ve heard your feedback on the Helldivers 2 account linking update. The May 6 update, which would have required Steam and PlayStation Network account linking for new players and for current players beginning May 30, will not be moving forward. We’re still learning what is best for PC players and your feedback has been invaluable. Thanks again for your continued support of Helldivers 2 and we’ll keep you updated on future plans.”


**Some Analysis **

Basically from the information I gathered here’s how I see it went down. The notice requiring PSN connection was always there where all the EULA requirements are (right side of the store page next to the game features. You have to scroll past the buy button to see it. I never look at those. “Requires 3rd-Party Account: PlayStation Network (Supports Linking to Steam Account)” The PSN connection requirement was —active— on launch for a short amount of time. Due to the massive server lag this was causing they paused the feature. They then reenabled, leading to the previous 2 announcements.


**Problems I see with Sony **

  1. They should never have sold to the 177 countries that it is illegal Corporate BS from the FAQ basically says go to a country that supports PSN, make an account, and go back.

Comment from @jet@hackertalks.com “Basically if you don’t live in a PSN country, they want you to lie to make a PSN account, making you in breach of the TOS. But they don’t want to say it directly. So they only answer in that mealy mouthed if you’re traveling scenario. What this means is if you live in one of the 66% of the world countries that doesn’t have access to PSN You’re going to lose access to the game. Unless you lie. And if you lie you could get banned.”

  1. They needed to make it absolutely clear in-game that they were having server issues and that PSN login would be required once they got that sorted.

This was a fuck-up on their part not keeping their users informed. If they had put in that simple notification in-game none of this would have happened.

  1. After one or two months of the feature not working and having huge success with the servers, amount of users, and player engagement, they should have just scrapped the feature.

  2. Anyone being gifted the game would not have been aware of this, ever.


**Good things that happened: **

  1. Steam offered full refunds to anyone that played, regardless of hours, which is extremely rare

  2. After much collaboration from the gamers, PSN is no longer required

  3. Gamers were able to push a corpo to not do some BS. Huge win


**To summarize: **

I didn’t notice the 3rd party login that was present when I purchased. That’s on me. Early gamers knew about the PSN connection. Any one of them that thought it was bad would have just returned it. Any one who didn’t care kept playing and didn’t bring it up because they didn’t care. Sony probably made the assumption people pay attention to those things. I will continue to play. For Democracy!

If you did leave a negative review consider taking it down. It is still a very great game. I’m going to delete mine but am not going to give a positive one due to the fuckery.

  • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    You are giving them all the power… it should be a lesson to never do it again. Your game stays looking like shit for even trying that bullshit. They already said PSN will be required for all their other PC games so they haven’t learned shit.

    I 100% guarantee they will add the PSN requirement back to Helldivers 2 a year down the road.

    Permanent consequences result in permanent changes. If we back down now it will only get worse in the future.

    If I threaten to join a Union because my work is treating me like shit and they stop treating me like shit so i don’t join a union whats stopping them from doing it to the next guy when I’m gone?

    You calling for people to change their review is completely counter productive to change in the future.

    • billbasher@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Again I’m not calling for it. Just consideration which led to the discussion we are having.

      If everyone gives a negative review for the other games that require PSN, then takes it back when they change then they will see their games stay negative until they take PSN out. Then they stop putting it in all together.

      I think your union example doesn’t quite fit the situation. A union gives you lawful rights. The threat for the company to start treating you right is that unions exist and once you join you don’t quit one. We have no rights on steam so our only influence is negative reviews. If we never ‘reward’ the company for not being dirt bags then even if they make a bad decision, there is no incentive to change it back.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You are comparing apples to jellyfish… Unionization is not the same as consumers interacting with a company.

      I’m being snarky btw. I’m purposely referring to your other comment.

      I personally will do the ‘tit for tat’ approach. But if you wanna keep sticking it to Sony, go at it.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I dont want to defend Sony, but the big issue here was the fact that it was not required at first and sold in regions where psn is not available.

      If they want to release future titles on PC with a psn requirement that’s their business, as long as they do it in the proper regions and with the explicit and consistent requirement. They must make it clearly known to the customer beforehand.

      I don’t have to like it and i certainly won’t buy any game with that requirement, but they corrected this fuckup and I can continue to enjoy this product I bought, free of psn.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Plenty of third party accounts are needed for steam purchases, that alone isnt news worthy or even really objectionable at this point. And were it just for that we would have never gotten sony to back down, or even close to this amount of outrage.

          What made this protest succeed are the accidental sales outside the psn regions, and the attempt to make psn mandatory retroactively.

          If I may ask, what are you so mad about? We got what we wanted, a purchase we made to remain as it is. I won’t be buying their products in the future if psn is required, but i also dont care about their shitty business as long as it doesn’t affect me. And we averted that.