• MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I hope this doesn’t make them think they can do this again though. This should make them realise they should’ve always gave the Devs more time to cook or been more realistic with scope from the get go

    • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      149
      ·
      7 months ago

      A publicly traded company prioritizing consumer satisfaction over short term profits? Learning from their “mistakes” after they still got a shit ton of money for it anyways and probably will if they do it again? I’m not banking on it.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It being released in a essentially a beta state with a terrible UI? half the loot being a bitch to access because you always cast igni? Game breaking bugs and glitch’s? Hard crashes?

            I don’t think they have released one game that was actually release ready yet.

            CP2077 was far worse, but that doesn’t mean the Witcher 3 was okay, it was still absolutely botched.

            • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              CP2077 was far worse, but that doesn’t mean the Witcher 3 was okay, it was still absolutely botched.

              This is literally a rewording of what I just said.

                • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I’m not downplaying anything, but comparing a dumpster to a dumpster fire and saying they are the same thing is, at best, a little misleading.

                  The release of Witcher 3 was bad, but it was industry standard bad. Cyberpunk shipped straight up broken and incomplete. It has been fundamentally reworked at least twice since launch.

                  I don’t think anyone is apologizing for The Witcher 3 at launch, but let’s not pretend they are the same thing. There are more shades than black and white.

        • Drasglaf@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Strangely enough, I didn’t have any game-breaking bugs or crashes and I played it at launch. I guess I was lucky.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I had the quest glitch where you could no longer progress the story. It was also in the later 25% of the game, so 80ish hours in.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Lol I was gonna say

        What a naive and unrealistic outlook on how the world works

        But you already said what I was gonna say but smarter

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      7 months ago

      But they can, because it seems like most gamers have goldfish memory, and they forgot/forgave the shitty launch and first years

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        My thought coming into this thread. Plenty of people here sucking their dick and forgetting the terrible launch. They earn what they deserve.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          i bought into it and hate that its getting so much praise.

          fixing the garbage they released is bare minimum.

      • mriormro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        I still think this game is shit since I was subjected to the release version and haven’t picked it back up ever since.

        Fuck this game and the management that fucked it all up.

      • asret@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        In my experience it was much less buggy at launch than for example Elder Scrolls: Oblivion. I didn’t experience any game-breaking bugs, just ones that harmed immersion. There was a bit of T-posing, the occasional floating prop/animation bug, and once I got launched into the desert when climbing through a window. No crashes to desktop, no broken progression. It probably helped that I was happy with the game they delivered rather than getting hung up on what may have been promised.

        • Optional@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          bethesda games are known to be shit and buggy since forever and they mostly don’t even fix em after years it’s just how they operate . which isnt something ppl should normalize even sea-dogs / not developed by them - morrowind - oblivion all had these issues bethesda is really not a rolemodel on these things

          • asret@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, just wanted to contrast the reception they got. Bethesda games don’t generally attract as much ire for the bugs. People expect them and tolerate them (to an extent). Cyberpunk 2077 was a totally broken mess according to the internet, while the Elder Scrolls are the greatest thing ever.

            I had crashes to the desktop about every 4th area transition in Oblivion and it still didn’t bother me too much, since it had just saved and took less than a minute to get back into the game.

            Some bugs - even total crashes - can still be put up with just fine.

            • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Anecdotally, I feel like there is some survivorship bias going on here. I’ve seen plenty of complaints about Bethesda bugs over the years, but people that are truly bothered by it (me!) have sworn off all their games and thus have no reason to talk about them anymore. The only ones left playing are those that still have some enjoyment/respect for Bethesda games. Cyberpunk felt like more of a “mainstream” hit so it makes sense there was more backlash.

            • Optional@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Because bethesda ( unfortunately ) got grandfathered in to making very good open world games FULL OF BUGS AND kinda got away with it undeservedly so ( kinda like how pokemon gets away with making mediocre games coz they were the first . like imagine call of duty ( as shit as they are ) making 2 versions of games and sellling you different weapons on each and you gottta payy 140 dollars :D if you want full content. but ppl are kinda waking up starfield was criticized more than their last games etc… ( id say cyberpunk was still worse than most elder scroll games though ( but still totally agreee with you different fan bases treat games differently both arent ok.

      • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        What I think is astonishing to some people lately about Cyberpunk, is that they got most of their information from the popular channels on the internet. Despite its name, these channels (reddit r/all, Twitter, etc) are a (loud) minority of the actual opinions.

        Pretty much every one I talked to IRL about Cyberpunk was aware of the controversy, but had a much more nuanced opinion than I was seeing online. Many of them enjoyed it and weren’t really experiencing that many bugs (myself included). But this wasn’t an “allowed” opinion online. Anyone who said the game was enjoyable or they didn’t personally experience many bugs were attacked for being a CDPR fanboy (myself included) and down voted.

    • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly though, I believe the early issues with the game were mostly on consoles. On a decently specced PC, the game would run nicely right after launch, with some bugs, but nothing game breaking. I got it right after launch day and enjoyed myself quite a bit with it. The police and the way the cars drove were the things that bothered me the most.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I remember hearing even some high specced pcs were having issues and you had to essentially be lucky that you had a configuration that they had the time to optimise for. Just having the best gpu wasn’t enough, for example

        • hswolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          thats was just a loud minority talking about super max setting with Raytracing and 4k

            • hswolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not that I remember, true that it didn’t handle the last gen consoles, and that it was marketed as quite demanding

              Sadly “minimum” or “recommended” just tells us the game runs, not that it runs well

                • hswolf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The thing is what is the consensus of “runs well”? Is it a FPS constant? No glitches? Fast loads?

                  My point is, a game can come shitty and run a constant 30 fps under the “recommended” since that’s what they thought was appropriate

                  Is a gray area that should be more descriptive, not sure why downvote me

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I had a decent AMD card which ran it very well, but still had a bunch of artifacts like Judy’s head blocking reflections for the whole lake.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        True, though that shouldn’t give anyone dev or publisher the right to release a broken game on consoles because it works on PC. Either postpone the PC release date until the console issues are fixed, or release as a PC exclusive until the same. Part of the reason the game was so successful with phantom liberty is that they stopped previous gen console work so they could only focus on hardware that could actually support the game. As with many devs, their partnerships fucked them, getting pressure from Sony, MS, and Nvidia to release the game before it was a polished product

      • antaymonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I tried playing on the lowest possible settings with a 1070 and averaged around 14fps :/

        I still finished the game because it was awesome, but haven’t revisited it ever since.

        • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t remember it being that bad on my 1070 mobile laptop (8th gen Intel i5 H if I’m not mistaken), but it was sub 25 fps also. On my PC it ran better, but after upgrading to a 3080 with a 5800X3D was when it ran smoothly at higher resolutions, although the game also had received some updates by then.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I played it on a pc that was ok at the time and the physics engine glitched out so things that were supposed to be sitting still on top of/next to each other would randomly collide and sometimes fly off. Still had fun with the game though.

        • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I had some cars that were following an invisible road above where the real road was a few times, and although that broke immersion a bit, I also still had a lot of fun with the game.

    • dsemy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s no chance this won’t happen again IMO (though since they abandoned their own engine maybe it won’t be as buggy this time).

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I might actually bother getting it now.

    It’s kind of ridiculous nowadays that games are released, and then developed afterwards.

      • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, only buying games after they go on discount couple months after release. By that time, the game is usually also finished

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, upper management at CDPR ignored the devs who told them the game wasn’t ready to ship yet, but they really wanted to take advantage of the new market of players staying home and playing video games after covid first hit.

        That short-sighted money grab cost them so much in the long run. It’s actually insane to see CDPR’s redemption arc play out after how badly they handled the launch.

        • Weslee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Cyberpunk was in development for atleast 12 years, I agree that corporate needs to be hands off when it comes to things like that, but at what point is there a line drawn and you just have to publish what you have got.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ve never heard this claim. Googling it I see one thing that says 8, and that likely includes pre-production and all that stuff, before you move a full team into development. The Witcher 3 came out in 2015, so the team could not have moved to CP2077 before then, and some of them stayed to make the DLC and patches. That leaves 5 years of full time development, which is not odd for a modern AAA game.

            • Weslee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I figured it was probably around 12 years, since the first teaser trailer came out 11 years ago, add afew years for the work they needed to do to even be ready to do a trailer (world lore, characters, etc)

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s based off of a tabletop game. That trailer mostly just needed CGI work, and a basic feel for what they would aim for. That trailer was probably before pre-production even started.

          • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            Its worth mentioning that the 12 years was not at all productive. The first 6 years was basically just two guys with rough concepts, only 6 years of actual dev time. Then about 3 years in they got a new creative lead on the project who decided to scrap essentially everything and start from scratch on a whim. Then the devs get the release date the same time we do which is 2 years earlier than they expected having assumed that they’d get around 5 years of actual dev time since being made to start over.

            So yeh there was a lot of screwing around by management.

      • Optional@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        they were coz cdproject red is still a company with multiple investors-buiness ppl but it still wasn’t an excuse the state game was in. it was really at a no excuse territory specially considering the scope amount of money that was spent on it . it wasn’t just outside pressure they did fuck up royally . but despite shit bugs (some very hilarious) at its core was a really good game and it showed even back then. so good on them ( despite the launch issues which are still inexcusable

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, I think games just take longer to develop nowadays than anyone is prepared for, especially the managers. Both companies and gamers have yet to realize that there is only so much you can accomplish in a certain span of time.

  • Antithetical@lemmy.deedium.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I got this game finally last year, after waiting for the bugfixes, and have been playing since then. I’ve got over 170 hours now, did all the sidemissions and now finishing Phantom Liberty, and loved every minute of it. This was my first dive into the cyberpunk-genre and it is impressive, especially the dystopian future that also seeps through in modern times.

    The way Cyberpunk 2077 tells its story and does world building is beautiful. The immense city with twirling roads, mountains of trash and dysfunctional society is really immersive. I understand that it is not possible to give every citizen a full back story with limited resources but the amount of detail and love that they were still able to put in is commendable. Even after all this time spent in the gameworld it still manages to surprise me with random encounters while exploring.

    I’m glad I waited for the bugfixes and had only a few crashes and minor glitchy physics. I hope they learn that delivering a good product is more important then deadlines, since players like me will wait anyway.

    Fun fact: in no other open-world-game I got run-over by cars as much as in this game. Hmm I wonder, maybe all cars evolved from Tesla’s in this universe? (j/k)

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just started it and am having a similar experience, right down to getting hit by cars. At least, I assume they were all cars. Last time I was suddenly knocked off my feet was on the sidewalk, and when I finally regained control of my character, there was no vehicle driving away from me. It could have been a goat fitted with optical camo for all I know.

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man I’ve got really conflicted feelings about this game. I do think it’s great, and will probably be picking up Phantom Liberty next sale, but I never know whether to appreciate the devs for sticking with it and making sure their work lived up to expectations, or to be frustrated that I basically had to wait a year for a full product after buying for $80 CAD on day one (my own mistake, I foolishly thought CD Project was immune to such blunders). I guess it’s a bit of both. I do really appreciate all the hard work, I just wish that wasn’t on top of a bunch of frustration and disappointment.

    • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Totally get where you’re coming from. But you can enjoy the game and dislike the way they marketed and released it. 90% of life isn’t a zero-sum game. Despite what the internet would have you believe.

      • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is true. However, even as a young person I remember the times where a game being released meant it was done, and if it was butchered, that was that. There was no second chance for the studio because the community absolutely wouldn’t trust them.

        Now, that’s standard. Every AAA game is just assumed to basically be barely functional until 6+ months post launch. People have to say “why would you buy a game day one?” as if it’s a ridiculous notion to want to purchase a product that has been released onto a market. That sucks. It sucks that something that used to be a fun hobby is now a seedy grey market full of vitriole.

    • johnlobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      they should learn from the fiasco, don’t promise what the devs can’t deliver, marketing department should ask the devs what they can promote. and you shouldn’t buy game on day one 😂

    • EtherealMoon @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The straight-up lies are what really get to me. Bullshots and fake-ass trailers for almost a decade. Hype for shit that was never going in. And now people just say “it’s great, what’s your problem?” like they want it to happen again.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think when they fixed all the obvious jank, went all in on the world building and strong storytelling, and timed it with the incredibly excellent Cyberpunk Edge runners series… Everything turned around.

    The game is still pretty crappy as a open-world, loot still feels halfbaked and honestly combat is so dumb that I have to gimp myself and refuse to pick certain skills just to have some challenge.

    But I ignore it because when the story pulls you in, you’re hooked!

    • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s funny, I feel kinda the opposite lol. The story just feels ok to me (I thought the story of PL was a lot more interesting though) but I just love the setting and just blasting through enemies

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        Last I played - forever ago - I was just disappointed that the random NPCs were nothing but decoration. Made the whole setting feel flat to me, sadly.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I loved the world, enjoyed its story but didn’t like the combat as it felt a bit messy and I felt overpowered as a hacker.

      After two playthroughs, I’ll probably do the expansion at one point but I don’t know if I should play it from one of my playthrough or from a new save.

  • cahhts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 months ago

    I bought this game day 1, put about 20 hours in and set it down.

    Picked it up again three months ago and have not set it back down. Best game I have ever played. I’m a sucker for lore and mission content and this game just does not fail to deliver.

    I know it had a rough launch and I don’t want that to be acceptable, but god damn this game is just so good. Like, so fucking good. Despite the launch I have to give it to them, they fixed it and it is just endlessly amazing

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s outstanding, but even right now at its best it still isn’t perfect.

      I’m very, very much looking forward to what they can eventually do using UE5 as the base in an era with generative AI to fill out the edges.

      When the polish (pun intended) is there, the game is beyond everything else. But when you end up just a bit past the edges of where it holds your hand, it quickly loses the veneer, which is the key difference vs something like a Rockstar open world (but also very different budgets and aims).

      There’s a handful of studios I think will adapt especially well to the future of game development, and CDPR is one of them.

      Because it is going to be possible to have CP 2077 main scenario style interactions across an entire open world within the next decade. And who better to curate that experience than the people delivering it in a diagonal slice?

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well deserved. It’s a masterpiece though it took a while to be polished properly

  • Shalakushka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reading this thread makes me feel like I’m taking crazy pills. This game was mediocre as fuck. The open world was practically empty. There were like five characters with anything but a superficial motivation. Combat is point and click nothingness, there is no strategy whatsoever and the AI is practically nonexistent. Constant bugs and graphical issues. The big fixes only fixes the very last thing.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Based on everyone telling me BotW and TotK are the finest games ever made, perhaps people just want mostly empty open worlds with basic combat and max five characters with personalities.

      • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I felt the same about BotW. At first I enjoyed the freshness and exploration but it quickly gave way to the sinking realization that it’s an empty world with smatterings of lifeless villages and MMO-style quests. Ew.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah. I’d much rather have the small number of deeper side quests in OoT or MM than, “hey buddy can you catch me ten crickets in exchange for a fistful of rupees? Thanks.”

      • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not a CDPR fanboy. Or at least I wasn’t before Cyberpunk. Cyberpunk and Hades are probably the best games I’ve played in a decade.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Amen to that. Technical issues aside, it’s one of the most shallow open world games I’ve played. There’s nothing to do when you’re not doing missions. There’s no depth to the combat. It’s a 5/10 at best for me.

      • Optional@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        i think you are being hyperbolic ( although its your subjetive opinion for sure ) id give it ez 7.5 etc… and higher coz i like cyberpunk you know i enjoyed shadowruns better ofc but thats coz i like izometrik

    • trslim@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Have you played it after the 2.0 update? The combat feels awesome, as least my build did. I also disagree with the openworld being empty, driving around, listening to music, was one of my favorite things to do. Occasionally coming across little stories and unmarked encampments was really fun.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There is some truth to what you say but the game is more than a sum of its parts. Even though individual strokes of game dev brush may be not perfect the whole package as of today creates memorable, even unforgettable experience.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think you’re one of the people who wanted a cyberpunk GTA game and didn’t get it.

      The story is fucking amazing, some of the side quests will stay with you for a long time.

      The combat and driving are fine, I endure both to get forward in the story.

    • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Eh, at least as far as the combat goes I liked doing the Net Runner thing: hacking cameras left and right and killing off enemies before they ever saw me. That being said I put the game down when it became too much of a chore to get much anything upgraded. My combat style may have been suboptimal but I had fun with it.

      I also didn’t have any issues with bugs or graphical issues, but I also first played it pretty far into its life after they could fix plenty of things. Don’t remember exactly when it was, but it was after the anime was no longer super relevant but before that big 2.0 update. I also know I played using some mods, and I can’t remember if there was a mod that fixed a bunch of issues.

  • soli@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    I played it a couple of years ago, before a lot of the patches, and still thought it was one of the better games I have never finished.

    spoiler

    There is this quest line where a character is abducted, raped, tortured and kills herself after you rescue her. Afterwards, the main character and another are on a balcony and smoke, still processing the horrors they’ve witnessed. I had been off the smokes for a few months at that point, but still needed to go outside and do the same.

    I uninstalled shortly after. Not out of disgust, I actually appreciated the game making me feel something, but it just felt right to stop at that point.

    • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      The whole game has an amazing story, that actually hooks the player’s emotions. It’s fantastic. It’s so refreshing after so many games with lazy writing or voice acting. I also played shortly after release, only experiencing 2 major bugs in my playthrough. I know others had it worse, but it was actually refreshing on that front too.

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man, I’m glad that people are enjoying the game as much as they say they are but I tried my first play through earlier this year and it was terrible. I saw almost no difference in the amount/type of glitches between what I experienced back in January and what I saw online when the game first released a few years ago.

    • Howdy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      I played on launch month and only encountered one bug that was game breaking and it was only a loading point glitch where I had to load to a previous save point. Played just a month ago and the whole game was super smooth.

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have 50+ hours and only minor graphic glitches. A couple dead bodies standing up, the odd piece of floating loot. Nothing that seriously detracts from the experience.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sweet. Thanks. SD has pretty much completely taken over as my gaming PC, so whenever I get around to 2077, I’ll be doing the same as you.

      • Akinzekeel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I keep hearing this from people but it runs terrible on my SD. Cannot get more than ~27 fps and it regularly dips below that.

        Did you tweak the settings somehow?

        I previously played it on my Xbox and had a great time. Would love to play it again on the SD eventually.

        • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s weird did you tweak the graphics settings?

          I am using the steam deck defaults and it is limited to 30 FPS. But it’s stable it didn’t bother me so far.

          If I were to unlimit the FPS it stays in the 30-40 fps based on a small run I did now in Dogtown.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Legitimately one of my favorite games. Incredible story, characters, and side quests. It’s also the only time I’ve actually felt like I was in a city when playing a game, they absolutely nail the environment and setting. It feels like a true city, not a video game city.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    What idiots gave this game a good review? It’s not like no man’s sky that had a small team and dozens of legal trolls as well as a flood.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is like No Man’s Sky in that most people who weren’t fanatical about saying it had a huge turn around stopped caring about it after a year or so.

    • scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      (First off, the last gen versions were a shit show and I fully believe CDPR should have bit the bullet and cancelled those preorders. That was a failure at the high levels, not with the devs. This is about the PC version:)

      Hey yo, I’m one of those idiots that gave it a good review, and that was day one. Yeah, it had a bad launch, but I’d argue it was no worse than No Man’s Sky, or Vampire The Masquerade: Bloodlines, or The Witcher 3. All of the above are some of my favorite games of all time.

      If you don’t like the core game, cool. Agree to disagree. But the things that people love about the game now have been in there since 1.0. Sure, there are genuine criticisms to be made, but most of the hate this game got has either been patched out or was pure bandwagon hate to begin with.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        The point I’m making is that they had no excuse to release it in that state in the first place unlike hello games with no man’s sky which was also a horrible launch.

        • scops@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          On old gen consoles, yes. On PC, it was merely a rough launch, not the industry shattering event it was made out to be.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think anybody’s forgotten, it’s just that CDPR actually fixed almost all of the issues players had with the game, from performance bugs to totally revamped features and game mechanics. The game is in a much better state now than 3 years ago when that video was made; it’s almost unrecognizable from its original release form now.