• Overzeetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    take economics; many traditional conservative positions square pretty well with economic theories and practices

    Like trickle down theory, corporate personhood, that tax breaks will result in tax revenue, and that government austerity is preferable to stimulus to move an economy from recession to expansion? They’re zero for four in the most popular 20th century conservative economic theories. I’m not sure that economics is the best lens to view conservative theory in a positive light.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude. What you consider “the left” IS CONSERVATIVISM. The USA is soooooo far afield, people are sooooo brainwashed, they can’t hold a liberal thought in their heads if they fucking tried.

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        US liberals are more centrists in a European sense, no argument there. I’m just pointing out that offering up US conservative economic theory as a shining star of success is not the boast they think it is.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          neoliberalism is conservative ideology and it has been doing very well the last 40 years, to our vast detriment

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, Reaganomics was a bad-faith move by social regressives. Corporate personhood has been a reality since Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. in 1886, so I guess that’s conservative, but also not exactly. The idea of laissez-faire economics–that the market will mostly sort itself out with minimal gov’t intervention–is generally upheld by prevailing economic theories, and is a fundamentally conservative view. I happen to disagree with the economists though, because they’re only looking at it as an economic issue, rather than economics being a manifestation of the social realities.