• @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The notion that more is better than less has been a dominant paradigm in various fields of inquiry, from economics to psychology. However, this paradigm has been challenged by recent philosophical developments that question the validity and applicability of this assumption. I have examined the arguments for and against the traditional paradigm of more versus less, and explored some of the exceptional cases that defy this binary opposition. In order to reconcile these conflicting perspectives and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between larger and smaller quantities, further research is still required.

        • @ngdev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Exactly. When I was a kid, my parents gave me a job at the family business. It was great, they said I could work half days. I could do whatever i wanted with the other 12 hours.

    • @boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And that should be the goal of a society. Currently we work because as individuals we’re forced to. As humanity we’re already past the forced need. Enabling people to choose would be more beneficial and we have the innate quality of finding meaningful ways to spend our time.

      • Peruvian_Skies
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        The problem is that we suck at allocating productivity. For example, we produce enough food for everyone but don’t distribute it half as well as we should, so people still starve while food rots somewhere else. We waste resources propping up a whole host of parasites that add no value to society, such as famous-for-being-famous celebrities, advertisers, speculators and redundant managers, while underpaying the people who actually produce wealth. And we want a brand new iPhone every year, a brand new car every two years, etc, and by and large don’t recycle. We’re wasteful.

        Most of the actually important and time-consuming work is automated already. If we were smart about what work we do, an 8-hour work week for everyone would be more than possible. But we are so inefficient with our productivity due to warped priorities that most of us barely scrape by as it is.

        • astraeus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Our excessive lack of proper planning and foresight really gets accentuated when you evaluate how wasteful and inefficient any of our processes are. I’ve been listening to Walden on audiobook recently, it’s almost as if Thoreau really did transcend his time and saw that the future would be equally as futile as his present at properly providing for humanity in a meaningful way.

          We would rather have luxuries and pleasures than fulfilling proper needs, work tends to take away from our needs in ways we overlook.

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1181 year ago

    This just in: humans do not enjoy any degree of enslavement.

    Check back next year to see if we’ve managed to break the spirit of the human race.

    • @BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      This is true. It’s because we evolved over many hundreds of thousands of years as egalitarian hunter-gatherers and only relatively recently invented things like agriculture, big stratified societies, the bulk accumulation of wealth and property and work.

      • @SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        This reminds me of a recent meme pushing back against the “greed is human nature” narrative. Was something like:

        “If you see a bear riding a bicycle at the circus, do you assume it is the nature of bears to ride bicycles?”

    • @RattlerSix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I absolutely love this: “The Miami Herald published an article in 1981 about an 89-year-old man named Sammy James. James had worked for decades as a crate nailer and said his fast moves earned him the nickname, “The Nailer.””

      His job title was a crate nailer, but he got the nickname from his fast moves. That’s like being so good at operating the cash register you earn the nickname “The Cashier”

  • @GiddyGap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    531 year ago

    There’s a reason why it’s called “work” and “free time.” Most prefer free time to do whatever they actually want to do.

      • Matt
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Would like to have known your questions, though. All I have is your edit.

  • SpicyPeaSoup
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some people want to work. They usually have no hobbies, family, or interests.

    Or they have a job they love. I have heard legends of such things existing.

    • @Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      I have a job I love 99% of the time. And I have hobbies. I worked really fucking hard to get to where I am. 80+ hour weeks for months at a time for years.

      We also have other younger guys come in, and some of them want to learn, and they go right on up the chain. Then, we have people that want things handed to them, don’t wanna do anything, and wonder why they’re not getting promotions. I’ve even given them incentives, raises, and tried to coach them on what they should do to meet a goal we both set. Some just want to point fingers and blame everyone else, and never take responsibility for their actions

      But we have more success stories than “failures.” It’s good company to work for.

          • @BigNote@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Definitely something white-collar in any case. Nobody is working 80 hours a week for months on end as a roofer or brick-layer. Even fishermen only work 16 hour days for 2 week stretches which are physically punishing enough. The average human body just isn’t up to months of 80 hours/week of manual labor.

            • @Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s not white collar. It’s powerplants. I do work in management, but the deal when I moved up was that I still got to work in the field 50% of the time. I get burned out sitting in my office. And I definitely did not start in management, but at the very bottom

              And as far as the hours… there’s only so many people you can put on some jobs, so hiring others will just have them standing around

              Also, I’d say 90% of the people that work with me love their jobs. I’ve seen quite a few of them turn down better pay because we’re pretty chill and honest about work and expectations. We keep good people around as long as possible.

            • @microphone900@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I got close being a framer from 2012-2016. 6 12s in construction was pretty fulfilling and I really liked working with my hands even if the pay was crap. Now I’m an office drone and it’s just okay doing a regular 40 for waaay more pay and benefits. I keep doing it because now I have the space to do and buy the stuff I want and not feel economic pressures like I used to.

              Sometimes I miss the blue collar job, though. I’m glad I did it but I’m even more glad I made the career change.

        • Yea, it’s a good job. And it’s nothing about hiring more people. Some jobs can only be done by a few people, so we just go around the clock until it’s fixed and bring home big paychecks

      • @phlemmy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        This is also exactly my situation. I worked hard for my dream job and now it doesn’t feel like work but a fun game instead. I know that’s not the case for most, and I’m grateful for it.

        I do hire people for my department, and want to give them the same opportunity to be happy. It’s really hard to find someone who is as excited as me for what I do. It’s not so much they don’t want to work, but they don’t want to work HERE.

        • I forgot about my comment and just tried out Sync, and saw the replies…

          That’s great, though. This wasn’t my dream job, but I kind of fell into what I wanted to do along the way. It turns out that it’s very fulfilling and pays well. And I can’t think of anyone that is above me that I don’t like. No one has given me a reason to hate them, and I think they feel the same about me. The people that work for me like me, even though they’re constantly giving me shit

          I do like how this site (pretty much Reddit) acts like every employer is out to fuck them, and everyone is as miserable as they are.

        • @SimplyATable@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Hoping to be a software dev or some other similar job someday. I’ve been writing code in some capacity ever since I could write (thanks to an uncle who got me into it and paid for all kinds of learning opportunities), some kind of job revolving around it has been my dream for most of my life. I’m 20 now, tried getting into college this year but life is good at turning your plans upside down. I’ve still got plenty of time to chase that dream job at least, I just gotta get the knowledge and the degree

      • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Perhaps there’s a company out there where there’s an exception, but an 80+ hr work week means this company desperately needed to hire, or if you were salaried and especially not earning overtime, it was exploiting your value to get paid without sharing that compensation with you.

        If it was under the promise of future compensation, then it’s a case of I’d gladly pay you tomorrow for a hamburger today–still scummy.

        Internal promotion is pretty rare these days in my field. Usually, you have to jump ship and you learn quickly not to get too attached to a company.

        • @Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s because you can only put a few people on these jobs at a time, and you want damn good workers that do quality work. You don’t want multiple crews messing with some things because it can cause confusion or things to be missed

          And it wasn’t promised to me, but I did make it up the ladder some, and still have places I can go up to. It’s actually a really good job, pays damn good, but requires a person to put in some work.

          But, it’s nothing to go work a month like this, pay all your bills and have $15k extra after it’s all done

    • @marx2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Programmer here. The hobby became my job and it’s pretty great when there isn’t a layer of corporate bullshit on top and I can just be creative to satisfy that itch.

      Works out most of the time but I’m also able to contribute to open source when in at work so that helps.

    • @Littleborat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That’s me but they are underpaying me and are very nitpicky and pedantic in return and have no respect for the time I put into their stupid enterprise.

      As a result the can soon do the shit themselves.

      Their efforts of finding people with an iq over 100 have been mixed in the last few years. I am wishing them all the best.

  • @moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    I want to Do. I like Doing. I like getting good at Doing.

    I don’t like work. I only work so I can Do what I want.

  • Max_Power
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    According to a new survey … 1 in 5 executive leaders agree with this statement: “No one wants to work”.

    So, 4 in 5 executive leaders DO NOT agree with this statement, yet the message in the media is that “dammit, no one wants to work!”.

    Peak journalism.

  • @bentropy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I understand very well that nobody wants to work anymore. The problem is, that despite all the technological advancements we still have to work. It’s outrageous!

    • @physicswizard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s because people’s wants have shifted as technology progresses. If everyone was satisfied to live like a medieval peasant and all we needed to produce was clean food/water we probably could have automated most of the agricultural work and done away with the need for the majority of labor.

      But people today now want on-demand deliveries, entertainment, healthcare, telecommunications, international travel, etc. and they need to pay for these things somehow, which means work. These shifting desires continuously push the boundaries of what we are capable of producing which ends up redirecting labor rather than eliminating it.

      Edit: thanks for the down votes everyone. I’m not saying this is the way it should be or that people should live like peasants, just explaining the basis of consumer/labor theory from economics 101. People typically get more utility out of the things they buy using their wages than they would from not working at all. Right now that’s mostly because society would let you starve to death, but even if there was UBI or something like it, there would always be some people who would want to work in order to buy more things for themselves.

      • @SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Tangentially, if we could support everybody at the medieval peasant level without work, well, why don’t we? By which I mean, let’s institute a Universal Basic Income. What a familiar, yet so profoundly different, world it would be if you didn’t have to worry about having a safe (although Spartan) place to live, clean water to drink, basic, nutritious food to eat, and care if you get hurt or sick, no matter what. You’d still have to work for all the modern luxuries.

        I guess the workers would have leverage against abusive, exploitative employers, if the cost of quitting a bad situation was simply not going to Paris this year, rather than life-or-death struggle, and we can’t have that!

  • @blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Duh. Most people want money, the work itself is just a means to an end. And even many of the people that do enjoy their work would do something different with their life if money wasn’t an issue.