Ever seen someone doing their “unskilled job” all their life? It’s just fucking magic!

The truth is that capitalists hate skilled workers, because those workers have bargaining power. This is why they love the sort of automation which completely removes workers or thought from the equation, even if the ultimate solution is multiple times more expensive or less competent than before.

Nothing is more infuriating to a boss, than a worker that can talk back with experience.

  • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s “more” in the sense that I learned how to flip burgers in a day. Can’t say I can learn to do surgery in a day.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then I suggest using the word more valuable skill than being more skilled. More valuable skill since it implies rarity and not some sort of hierarchy. That’s my take anyways from the word “some jobs require more skill”.

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, yeah. I guess it is because I am often jumping fields because otherwise it can get confusing when switching context (I am a mechatronics engineer, so a blend of mechanical, electrical, control system, and programming)

                • bitfucker@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  From my understanding, pedantic is a pedant, which itself means “a person who is excessively concerned with minor details and rules”. And aren’t we debating the usage of words unskilled from the post? I agree that “unskilled” is inappropriate since it implies it doesn’t require any skill at all. There are always skills involved. I also disagree if we call one job requires “more” skill than another. “More” implies that skills are hierarchial (at least to my understanding, because you can have more or less amount of something) whereas I think it is not. I think a skill is a skill, and what makes them distinct is how rare a skill is. Rarity however, doesn’t imply having “more” skill. A person can be MORE SKILLED IN THE SAME SKILL. Not across different skill. Hence why I said surgery doesn’t require MORE skill than burger flipping. They are distinct skill. If surgery requires MORE skill than burger flipping, then if a person is a good surgeon, he is a good burger flipper.

                  • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    My dude it’s not about rarity. It’s about how long it takes to acquire a skill, and what kind of aptitude you need to have, and how difficult it is. Also one person can have more skills total than another. You can’t say that learning to flip burgers is as difficult and time consuming as learning how to do brain surgery. Are you nuts?