• Yote.zip@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Grats on Arch Linux install, S-tier distro for what it attempts to accomplish.

    It feels like there needs to be a category in between conservative and paranoid. I’m probably 90% of the way over to tech paranoid but using Tor Browser and Tails is a little much.

    • KindredAffiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grats on Arch Linux install, S-tier distro for what it attempts to accomplish.

      For some reason, the best word to describe it in my mind is “fun”. Just fun to learn and play with, fun to install, fun to configure and customize, and fun to daily drive. Definitely not fun when a random package update breaks your system (looking at you grub), but that hardly ever happens anymore provided you don’t enable the testing repo.

      Also pacman is the fastest package manager I’ve ever used.

      • Yote.zip@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apt is very quick as well (with the nala frontend), no complaints there. I’ve been running Arch for the past 5 years and recently switched to Debian Stable. The “grub event” was certainly notable, but otherwise I don’t think Arch is really that unstable or gimmicky. Arch itself is a very solid and dependable platform - the reason I decided to move is because I really don’t need the bleeding edge packages from other projects anymore. With Flatpaks and all the rest of the /home-based package managers that are around now, I can keep a stable base system and install a couple bleeding edge packages that I want, instead of being forced to run my entire system as bleeding edge (do my printer drivers really need to make me bleed?).

        Overall, I’d say the Arch experience is as high quality as the Debian experience, they just target different usecases. Neither of them is better, it’s just up to the user how bloody they want their system to be.

      • substill@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please tell me there aren’t two more tiers to the right of paranoid. The last tier would just be “homemade pencils only.”

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s one either side!

          Edit: also, I’m at “Newborn Paranoid” and definitely feeling the pull towards tech paranoid. Writing this on Librewolf in Arch (btw) lol.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also the middle should be called Tech Centrist or Tech Social Democrat, daring to use the projects from philosophical minorities is not conservative at all.

  • wigsinator@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brave being listed alongside Firefox

    Bestie Brave is literally just Chromium again. Not to mention the fact that their CEO is someone who got ousted from Firefox for being a tremendous bigot. It’s not a better alternative to Chrome, it’s just the same thing again. It you must use a chromium browser, use ungoogled.

  • _danny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    What does MKBHD have to do with this? He’s just a tech reviewer who kinda fits between tech normie and tech conservative

    • illectrility@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s the kind of guy that looks at a Fairphone and says “if you compare this to a Pixel, the Pixel is faster”, talks about how important repairability and sustainability is, vows to mention it in future phone reviews and then proceeds to never mention it ever again but instead keeps on saying how great the new iPhone is.

      I’m not kidding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkmzDwgvqQM

    • Nioxic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And he mostly talks about phones anyway… hardly relevant to the avg pc enthusiast as he only covers macbooks and not their competition, which is silly.

  • LennethAegis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fall under Tech Conservative mostly, but I would like to edit the last 2 points to this for myself:

    “Believe every publicly traded company is inherently evil”
    “Doesn’t morally support big tech, but uses some anyway”

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the reason free software exists.

        Also one of the only people I’ve seen who routinely attempts to ensure people don’t insult each other (like you have) on the mailing lists he frequents, so he gets another point in my book.

        • mitch@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mmm, people only get so many bites at the “vociferously defending pedorasty’” apple before you’re written off in my eyes. He is far beyond that point, even after decades of having to listen to people make appeals to authority.

          • dsemy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you actually read the what he wrote, or did you read what others wrote about him?

            Consider the fact that he promotes an ideology that is extremely dangerous to various powerful people; it would be naive to assume none have tried to weaken his message by presenting him in various ways.

            As to his latest controversy, if you actually read what he wrote, and understand that he chooses his words very carefully, you will see that he did not say anything controversial at all.

  • PeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tech paranoid all the way, although not the same type of tech paranoid as Luke Smith. The only good computer is one you have the hardware schematics to (i.e. virtually none of them). Thinkpads are just another brand of overpriced laptop. Besides the occasional steam game, I heavily prefer FOSS only and will flat out refuse almost anything that has drm. My unlocked bootloader android phone is so heavily locked down with privacy stuff that I cause Google to lose money merely by existing.

    • beansthefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still around, just in a much smaller capacity. IRC clients are still being actively developed today too.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    🏳️‍⚧️ Congratulations on coming out and I wish you a successful transition. 🏳️‍⚧️

  • dsemy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    For fellow paranoids:

    Mullvad browser is a fairly new Firefox fork which aims to reduce fingerprinting potential while also having sane (paranoid) defaults. Developed with the Tor project. Basically the Tor browser but without connecting to the Tor network. Passes coveryourtracks.eff.org.

    SimpleX Chat is a fairly new privacy oriented IM platform which seems to address many issues current ones have. Development is very active. E2E, video and voice calls, decentralized, doesn’t have user ID of any kind.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tor/Mullvad are better for anonymity use cases, but when you go tweaking it (settings, add-ons) you are no longer blending in with the pack. LibreWolf suits a more privacy-oriented use case I think since it’s not aiming to mimic Tor, but just have privacy settings mostly maxed out & you opt into everything you are comfortable with, such as cookies—whereas base Fx you have to opt into more privacy.

  • Goodie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Somewhere between Normie and Tech conservative?

    Real bummer that Signal decided to shit the bed.

      • mitch@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. It’s possible to just pick your hardware, software, and other devices according to your needs. It always bums me out to see people limit themselves by stratifying along ideological lines.

        Sometimes it’s enough that it’s fun to go on the computer, y’know?