• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t think the license does anything at all

    ProPublica would disagree with you.

    you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID

    The specific license number is explicitly stated.

    How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so?

    Already discussed in that other conversation post.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially. You have completely different motivations. One major difference between you and ProPublica is they must have interacted with some actual lawyers explaining how copyright works.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.

        That’s just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.

        It’s actually not even my description, it’s one I got from someone else, who’s also licensing their content with the same license.

        I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.

        You have completely different motivations.

        No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)