• Matumb0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        6 months ago

        You are not in Europe my friend. Why do Americans not even understand their own voting system.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The Green Party is a thing in America.

          Republican and Democrat are the two biggest parties by a large margin, but a few other smaller parties exist. Plus, some people run as an Independent. They’re not affiliated with any party at all.

          Edit: I never meant to imply the other parties had any chance at winning an election in a meaningful way, which is what these replies seem to think I was saying. (They don’t have a chance, honestly.) But other parties do exist, including a party in which you can “vote green”. That is all I’m saying.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            In a first past the post system of districts with single representative candidates, it almost always resolves to two viable parties. That’s the way it’s been for basically all of American history.

            The parties can change, but the shape of the system remains constant: a vote is only effective when cast for the largest opponent of your least desired candidate. It’s unintuitive and discouraging.

            The parliamentary systems used in much of Europe, for all their flaws, do allow for more robust and diverse representation.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Greens in America aren’t in a position to govern. Even if Stein got enough electoral votes through the work of 30-60 literal miracles, she’d be totally unable to govern effectively. You need a deep bench and more of a base in the other branches of government to form a party that can effect changes and run this country

            • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              There’s more to federal elections than winning. It’s always hilarious when people that don’t understand how fucked our system is try to teach others.

              • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Despite there being more to federal election third party remains suppressed and will always be suppressed by first past the post.

                • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  100%. But ballot access, federal funding, and being able to actually run spoilers locally are pretty important.

                  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Only if you don’t consider the third party’s we have now act as an extention to the pejorative parties.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            I love how you exactly proved their point without realising. Please go look up the spoiler effect with first-past-the-post voting.

            • Zengen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Then we can use third party candidates to determine who the power actually goes to. At the end of the day. America is so bipolar split tlboth parties are now completely at the mercy of anyone who can garner 10% support. RFK Jr at this point can literally be the decider or who becomes president and who doesn’t. Maybe we can use that as a tool of power to force the 2 parties to open the voting system up or have their power cockblocked from them every election cycle.

              • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                6 months ago

                No, this is not how it works. Please look up the spoiler effect.

                I can’t vote because I don’t live there, but am in the imperial core of countries, so it would be very nice to not have fascists in charge, considering we literally have prosecuted whistleblowers reporting on warcrimes at the behest of the US government. We’re your little bitches whether we like it or not.

                Y’all really do need to be hyper-focused on pushing for sweeping electoral reform, for sure.

                In the meantime though, voting for a 3rd party under your system is basically a vote for the person you don’t want.

                Vote Biden if you would dislike having Trump more. If you don’t want to do that, then yeah, you’re basically admitting you’re cool with the outcome of Trump presidency.

                Please don’t waste your vote, your vassals beg you.

                  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Look up the spoiler effect. Please! This vassal is begging you.

                    The question under your system (please inform yourself about first-past-the-post) isn’t who do you want to win, it’s who you do you want NOT to win.

                    If you vote for your third-party candidate, it’s equivalent to not having voted at all, if they have no chance of winning.

                    You’re going to get Biden or Trump with how people vote (spoiler effect, look it up), one of those is going to win, make your peace with that.

                    So, which would you rather?

                    I am happy to spell out in greater detail why voting for a third party candidate is a waste of time under your system, happy to chat if there’s still any confusion about it.

                  • UnityDevice@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    As an outsider it’s really annoying when someone just doesn’t understand the reality they find themselves in.

                    A third party isn’t in the cards, it never is, but it especially isn’t right now. The only way to get a third party elected is to change your voting system, but that’s a process that takes years, decades even. It’s really not as easy as wasting a vote with a third party, it takes a lot more effort. And the only way to start or continue that process right now is to vote Biden because if Trump wins you might not even get another election to vote in.

                    And Trump has a good chance of winning because the republicans aren’t having such discussions. They know what to do, and come election day they’ll all march in and do their job, like they do every time. Remember that he only won last time because people like you felt icky about voting for Clinton.

                    If you allow me a moment of catharsis, I’ll just add that if you Americans once again subject the world to more Trump insanity, I really hope you get to feel the worst of it.

          • MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            There is no viable third party without voting reform.

            If you really want smaller parties to have any chance, go help the people within the democratic party who are trying to make that happen.

        • Zengen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wrong again. Your admitting we dont live in a democracy if thats the case. we dont live in a democracy the only solution is to oust the government.

          • papertowels
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, they’re right but we live in a flawed democracy.

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I believe it’s such a broken democracy that it doesn’t qualify as a proper democracy.

            So, tell me, how does third party voting or abstaining from voting help oust the government?

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        lol, you’re so free in the freedom land that you taking an un-awful option from the trainwreck gets you hate from the cult on both sides of the mainstream political parties.

        Good on you for having a conscience.

        Muricah!!!

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, I don’t know why I try with these liberal, blue wave fanatics. They just love genocide so much.

      • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I think in my country that’s called “Stemmespild”

        which basically means wasted-vote.

        if a political party wants to enter the parliament, they gotta get at least 2% of the votes. so if you vote for one of the very unpopular parties and they only get ~1.5% you’ve effectively wasted your vote completely (This is how it works in my country - of course things are different in the US)

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Things are even worse in the US. For president you need to get a plurality of the votes (more than any other candidate) nationally (let’s ignore the EC for now) which means that any vote not for the two candidates who stand a chance is wasted.

          But also in their congressional elections they set up the system so to get in you have to get a plurality in some district where only one representative will be sent each time (FPTP). So even if your party has 15% nationally, unless they can win a plurality in some districts, they won’t get any representation.

          Thats why 3rd parties are pure vote wasters in presidential elections and in Congress you only have a handful of independent reps who somehow win their districts without party backing.

          Cobtrast that with most of Europe (including Denmark(?)) where you have proportional voting for a parliament and then parliament forms a government. You can vote for your green party and while they might not get to be Prime Minister, they might be needed for the parliamentary majority to form a government and get the environment ministry. Win! Or they might just exert slight pressure in parliament directly, which is where laws are made. Not a loss!

          The poor 'Mericans, meanwhile, are screwed. The only reasonable choice is between the two major parties at the elections. To turn that oil tanker they have to get involved in those parties and try to affect which candidates are put forth and then the party even skips that step entirely if they happened to have won the last presidential elections.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t like the green party, they basically go away except for a publicity campaign once every 4 years.

        PSL is constantly putting in work and has been at nearly every student protest.

      • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s unfortunately a bipartisan system with the shitty electoral system that needs reformation. It’s barely a democracy, but there is a clear option out of the two, and for now, ensuring Trump is not president again is a step in a better direction.