• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh. Dude. Are you literally programmed to ignore women as a source of information? You have more context. She implied he’d be upset if she told him that was her plan. Why do you disbelieve that? You’re literally creating extra information that isn’t there to question her narrative that she’s given you zero reason to not believe. Why is your default to simply not believe her?

    And buddy, if your judgement isn’t above questioning, you’re trying really hard to argue that it’s more legitimate than hers.

    Edit: so to summarize your point. Given a bunch of made up information, you disbelieve her, for no reason, other than the hypothetical you made up in your head. Got it. Totally normal way to respond to this. Not at all toxic or unhealthy in any way. You’re totally a positive influence on society.

    • average650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of that accurately describes my position. Please reread my posts. I have doubts you are giving a good faith effort.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m starting to doubt that you have actual capacity for comprehensive reasoning. That is absolutely a direct inference of your position. Just saying “no it’s not” doesn’t just make it so. All of that is true if one holds your position.