• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      Cannabis sativa is the same plant for every single strain of cannabis in existence, as well as hemp. The meme is pointing out how we talk about sativa, indica, and hybrids as completely different plants, rather than variations of the same species

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        But each strain is different, right? Like how a chihuahua and a German shepherd are both dogs, but vastly different.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, the different strains absolutely have some differences, and I’m not trying to say it’s all bullshit. Weed is awesome, and we should document new stuff as it comes along, but we need to remember that it’s all a single plant. I’d say weed is like the apple of drugs

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes. Some strains smell like a baby just shit kn a diaper and some smell like a fresh cut mango mixed with some pine needles lol. Flavor also vastly different! It’s a wonderful plant to explore

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Cannabis sativa is the same plant for every single strain of cannabis in existence

        This is incorrect. Cannabis is the family designation where Sativa, Indica and Ruderalis are the species designations.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          This is debated. But this string is an explanation of recent debate. Whether it’s all sativa or there are the three sub species. I prefer the sub species route myself.

        • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          6 months ago

          They are the same species by the scientific definition. The meaning of the word “species” has become diluted over time as it was adopted by more people and misused, just like all language.

          • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            My point exactly. That’s why I find it a bit strange that the post and some comments here act like it’s a certainty.

            • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              In mycology one will hear references to ‘lumpers’ and ‘splitters’ taxonomically. That is, do we lump these specimens together, or do we split them into difference groupings. When we look at the genetics, it has been the case that we find that those critters that appear similar may not be those that are related by genes/ evolution. And of course by “we” I mean the larger scientific community, not me and the mouse in my pocket. Oh wait, that’s not a mouse it’s a shrew. ;-)

        • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Standard middle school definition of species is applicable here. If they can breed and their offspring is fertile, they’re the same species.

          QED, Spock is sterile.

          • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Standard middle school definition of species is applicable here

            And here I was thinking about looking into some of the papers for the actual reasons … but turns out those stupid scientists just wasted their time because they forgot about middle school. Fools!

            • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I kind of thought the Spock thing would convey I wasn’t 100% serious in my reply to a weed shitpost.

    • pudcollar [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I think the confusion is that there are two well-known subgroups of cannabis sativa, indica and sativa (ruderalis is more obscure). So the species and subgroup have the same name, to the consternation of indica lovers.

      It may also be referential to the greater indica/sativa internet drama, there are fierce disputes about the differences or lack thereof. The confusion is amplified due to the lack of quality control in cannabis genetics and sales, and most strains are hybrids between the two (or three)

    • worldwidewave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      As I read it, it’s basically saying there’s only one kind of red wine: red. You’re right, but you’re ignoring all of the subcategories that the typical consumers use to talk about it.

      Weed smokers typically consider strains to be either Indica or Sativa, but there’s a whole debate about if those are real differences at all. The plant itself is called Cannabis Sativa, hence why this statement is true.

      • Kroxx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah but the original cannabis indica described has none of the physical characteristics of what it does today, there is not a genetic difference between sativa and indica that is sold in the cannabis market today.