• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should they? You bought something from Microsoft, you get something in Microsoft quality. Phoning home your underwear size and sexual preferences and selecting the most intrusive ads for you included.

    • nitefox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause ads are acceptable only if we don’t pay, otherwise we are paying to be the product.

      even worse, we pay the console, the games (which aren’t cheap in the slightest) and the Gold to play online!

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, if the paying customer can also be sold off for extra cash, the more profit to them! And probably bigger bonuses for the higher-ups.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I started a new job where I travel a lot, and I’m wanting one more and more.

          How do you like it?

          • nitefox@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My brother has it and he travels a lot, he loves it. Before that he had to carry his gaming pc around, which was a brick

  • EighthLayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re not going anywhere. It’s another revenue stream for Xbox and the majority of users don’t care about them.

  • James@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ultimately you will have to accept that you don’t ‘own’ your Xbox. None of us do. Microsoft does, and you paid $500 for the hardware, which they can decide to brick remotely at any time.

    This is the tradeoff between console and PC. Console is significantly cheaper but you don’t get any control over it.

    Ads are never going away, and will likely only get more intrusive until people start hitting their breaking points.

    • sickmatter@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Microsoft owns most gaming PCs, too, with Windows which is increasingly ad-ridden. The existence of some Linux-based alternatives is still a small percentage compared to Microsoft’s dominance here.

      • James@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, they really ought to be getting cracked down upon by governments for their monopoly on desktop computing.

        Simply opening directX would solve a lot of problems with gaming.

      • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost every game I’ve tried to run on steam on linux, has worked. (though tbf, I don’t play multiplayer games).

        It really is worth at least giving it a try nowadays. You might be surprised

        • sickmatter@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree in principle. I’ve used Wine for games for a long time. Popular games usually worked even 15 years ago.