• @SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s a neat option but the example proof of concept alt text “The Firefox logo”, as I understand it, it isn’t ideal for describing the image.

    Maybe something like this?

    The Firefox logo which consists of a Fox wrapped around a sphere

    • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      395 months ago

      That would depend on the context. How the logo looks like does not matter most of the time, only when the logo itself is the topic.

      • @SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        155 months ago

        Makes sense. And if it’s not relative to the content you just put decorative only right?

        So…

        Welcome to Firefox ([Logo for Firefox] marked as decorative)

        vs

        Our sponsors are [Logo for Microsoft] [Logo for Firefox] [Logo for Google]

  • @OboTheHobo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    165 months ago

    This is the kinda stuff AI should be used for, this could be big for accessibility whenever alt text isn’t actually provided

  • @spacedogroy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    All sounds pretty sensible. I do think it might feel annoying waiting minutes to download a model for the sake of generating a line of alt text the first time, though. It would probably be quicker to write the alt text.

    • @elfpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      I think it’s about generating alt text for people with disabilities when they are missing from pictures.

      • @uhN0id@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Yeah if someone that is blind comes across a page I’m sure waiting for the description to generate is more valuable/worthwhile than a faster experience with no information at all.