• secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      if a group of people are in a burning building and about to die, panic would actually help them get out

      in this case, however, it’s unlikely anyone is going to get out of this building, and it’s too late to change things, so perhaps you are right

      we should just find ways to make peace with the destruction of much of life on earth

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Excellent example of what I mean. In a burning building panic isn’t helpful and hinders the actual correct response, just like with climate change.

        • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

          sitting around and debating the best way to proceed is stupid AF

          • ammonium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

            Not at all, why do you think during fire drills you’re instructed to stay calm?

            • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              They say that when there are large number of people and a risk of people being trampled or when there are young students and teachers need to keep count to make sure everyone gets out.

              At this point, the risk of every person on earth dying due to inaction or calmly discussing small ways to change is much higher than if everyone panics. People should have panicked 50 years ago when they looked at data.

              But go ahead, have calm rational discussions about policy decisions that can reduce exponential growth of destructive forces by 30 percent. Because nothing stops exponential growth like mild decreases in the rate of change.

              • ammonium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s not about policy but about economics. Solar is growing exponentially and will soon be our cheapest source of energy, even so cheap that it will be cheaper to make carbon hydrates from the air than pump up fossil fuels.