wnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 2 年前Superconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up157file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksworldnews@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinescience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinetechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up157external-linkSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comwnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 2 年前message-square32fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksworldnews@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinescience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinetechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squareHumbleHobo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前I think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.
I think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.