• MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean. I provided an actual source for my statement with aggregated data supporting my point. You, however, have not.

    Sounds like you need to be educated.

    And also the frenulum is not the foreskin.

    • voltaric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Propaganda and bad faith. Get out of here with your pseudoscience

      Brian Morris is a proven fraud

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      And also the frenulum is not the foreskin.

      While the other user hasn’t explained why it is relevant, they are correct in that it is relevant. This is because circumcision usually removes the frenulum, or at least a large chunk of it. And it’s downright criminal because the frenulum is very sensitive. What little left I have is the most sensitive part of mine.