• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Then you end up with the smaller trucks we already have on the market or a Maverick that has a bed so small that it’s not that useful for actual truck stuff…

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Surely you can imagine a truck that may or may not currently be on the market. This theoretical truck is minimally large enough to be reasonably safe, and also has a bed is as big as the trucks pictured. Like, a truck that does not have four doors and two rows of seating.

            • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I can’t believe I missed this photo of your “over capacity” truck carrying less than the rated capacity of the cars you insisted were too small and a photo of what looks like loose pine needles.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                What’s the capacity of the car? My truck is 1800lbs, the car can TOW (very important distinction that trolls want to “forget” about) 1000kg, which is 400lbs more than mine can haul, but, 9,000 less than it can tow….

                What’s the cars capacity, it’s towing is 1000kg.

                My trucks capacity is 850kg and 10,000kg towing. Thats an extra zero by the way in case you miss it.

                  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    What’s the cars CAPACITY? Why are you skirting around instead of answering the simple question, I bet the cars CAPACITY is less than my truck, that’s why you won’t answer, so what is it?

                    Your comment is obvious lie, it doesn’t have more capacity, answer the question and you’ll realize this, instead of lying? Why? After trying to call me out, you’re gonna do this? Seriously lmfao?

        • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          What? I just said it may or may not exist. And half the point of the image we are commenting on is that car makers are making excessively large trucks so it’s very possible that such a car isn’t currently being made. I’m just asking you to use 1% of your imagination to imagine a truck that has a full size bed that is neither the Kei nor a monument to man’s hubris. Like a 90s-sized truck.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            So if the thing doesn’t exist, why are so adamant that it’s possible…? Do you think maybe it doesn’t exist, since it’s impossible…? No… that can’t be the reason….

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, that’s a good assumption. Another possibility is that regulatory language incentivizes car makers to have larger vehicles.

              It doesn’t really matter whether there’s a market or not, because the main reasons to bemoan these monstrous trucks are that they are bad for the environment, a nuisance on roads and parking lots, and more dangerous for other cars and pedestrians.

              I think if the regulatory language is updated to disincentivize the monster trucks, then we’d see a market for the more 90s style trucks.

              For some people, the lack of second row would cause them to not get a truck with a full size bed at all, which I don’t see as a problem.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                But accidents in Canada are going down even though we buy just as many trucks so maybe the trucks aren’t the issue.

                From an environmental perspective, mid size and full size get the same fuel economy.

                90s trucks were pretty much exactly the same size, just not as tall.

                Crew cab long bed are available on ¾ ton (250/2500) format and up so that’s not what people are buying if they don’t do truck stuff anyway.