The current default “Homepage” value is “All”. That makes sense for users with zero subscribed magazines, so they see something.

But for users with one or more subscribed magazines, the default value for “Homepage” needs to be “Subscriptions”.

That’s partially just because subscriptions mean little if the default frontpage ignores them. But there’s a more important reason than that.

The current situation is that posts in m/Conservative are heavily downvoted, and barely upvoted. (Whatever your politics may be, consider if this was happening to you.) As more ex-redditors join, this problem is likely to worsen.

Eventually moderators need better controls, to say things like “Only members can vote”, etc.

But for now, a very easy fix is to change the default value of “Homepage” to be “Subscriptions”. Of course, “All” should still be a selectable option for those who prefer it.

  • Xuerian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This level of control is generally handled at the instance level.

    If you want to host a magazine and control interactions on it, host your own instance.

    • 10A@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There should only be one instance IMHO. And it should be able to support widely diverse communities.

      • Xuerian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        kbin is part of the Fediverse. It is one instance of many.

        I draw your attention to the sidebar:

        Create your own instance
        
        Clone repo and develop fediverse
        
        

        Several communities who have more difficult interactions with others have already followed this route.

        • 10A@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Encouraging fracturing into factions does no good for anyone. The internet needs a frontpage, and for years that was reddit. Now it seems to be kbin, maybe. Under the hood it may be a distributed system, but in practice normal people want a single website where a wide diversity of topics and opinions is embraced and protected.

          • Xuerian@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe, but it won’t be kbin, or other Fediverse sites.

            It’s a common enough opinion to want one site to handle everything, but that’s not how this is set up.

            • 10A@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly I think it is. Much as the underlying architecture expects federation, each instance competes in a market of commoditized goods, which leads to coalescence. So if the fediverse thrives at all, it will be with one giant instance. Perhaps there’ll always be a few other tiny instances for nerds (I use the word lovingly) who value that sort of thing, but normal people don’t understand the concept of an “instance”, and just want to show up at a .com to feast on data.

              At any rate, even if you’re right about federation, any social media service should seek to accommodate a wide diversity of ideas, opinions, and perspectives.

              • Xuerian@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                instance competes in a market of commoditized goods, which leads to coalescence.

                Any user on one instance can interact freely with users and content on another instance as if they were on that instance, unless there are specific restrictions put in place, or one of the two instances has blocked the other. This is rare and often to prevent brigading, as your main post complained of.

                So, not really. Normal people understand the concept of email. I don’t agree with the “It’s too complicated” suggestion. It’s been presented confusingly in this mad rush, sure.

                At any rate, even if you’re right about federation, any social media service should seek to accommodate a wide diversity of ideas, opinions, and perspectives.

                I think that’s entirely up to each instance. Not every instance has to be about everything or for everyone. Again, that’s the point.

                • 10A@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  With regard to federation, that’s true, but consider the bigger picture. A major news outlet discusses the up-and-coming website kbin, and a hundred million people show up to create an account. A popular search engine returns search results linking to kbin, and nobody says “I could click on that, but I have an account at some other instance, so I’ll just manually edit the URL.” The bigger picture is that the world wants a single instance.

                  With regard to the diversity of of ideas, opinions, and perspectives being up to each instance, I suppose I agree with you in principle, though I would find it deeply disappointing if any platform intentionally wanted to create a hivemind and actively silence dissenting voices. But if that’s where I am, then I suppose I’ll have to leave.

                  • Xuerian@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    A popular search engine returns search results linking to kbin, and nobody says “I could click on that, but I have an account at some other instance, so I’ll just manually edit the URL.” The bigger picture is that the world wants a single instance.

                    I think this is a valid issue and I think it’s something that deserves some attention if it isn’t on the mind of developers already.

                    From a generic developer perspective I see no reason why it would be impossible or even that difficult to improve the roaming experience.

              • Dalë@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                They don’t really need to understand the concepts of an instance within the federation system because ultimately you join whatever instance you want and search and then you can subscribe to anything you want it doesn’t matter whether it’s a one entire instance or one tiny instance in the federation.

                • 10A@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are already many observable instances (pardon the pun) of confusion, even among us early adopters. Time will tell if you’re right or if I am.

          • Sausage@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The internet needs a frontpage

            Does it though? The Fediverse feels a lot different to Reddit, which many here are taking as a positive. As others have mentioned, if you want a conservative safe space then go make one.