Saw this comment on the commie side of TikTok. My gut tells me this is ultraleft bs, but perhaps my fellow hexbears can educate me on this discussion which I’m sure is not new.

I don’t see how a poor American on food stamps is responsible, even though a systematic analysis reveals that international superexploitation is a thing.

The American proletariat can and should organize in any case. I don’t see how Americans can build any sort of socialist movement if any organization at all is accused of being hypocritical.

  • ComradeRat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    why do business hire anyone?

    1. So they can sell shit to them 2. Because they still have things that need doing 3. Because trade unions fought for higher wages (cf. Emmanuel Unequal Exchange) for more detailed examination.

    And if all business in the core are inherently unprofitable, what is the mechanism that keeps them afloat?

    Cope argues superprofits from imperialism

    • hotcouchguy [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      This could make some sense in aggregate, but doesn’t make any sense on a micro level. How does, say, a fast food franchise receive the super-profits? And why is the restaurant hiring people that lose them money? If it’s motivated by a need for sales, and the sales are “worth it” economically, meaning enough to cover labor and other costs plus profit, isn’t that just describing surplus value?

      • ComradeRat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re rly interested I’d suggest reading Cope’s book, as he lays out the figures and even the movement of the money better than I can with more citations than I can. As you suggest, it’s about the aggregate motion of capital. Take your restaurant example:

        The restaurant isn’t losing money so long as imperialism persists, because they’re selling e.g. burgers for inflated prices. The burgers can be sold for inflated prices because e.g. construction worker is paid inflated wages. Construction company can afford to pay inflated wages because it’s buying artificially cheap materials and because it’s being paid inflated fees by e.g. a bakery. Bakery can pay the inflated fees because it’s buying artificially cheap materials and because it’s selling e.g. cakes at inflated prices. The cakes can be sold for inflated prices because e.g. tech employees are paid inflated wages. Tech companies can afford to pay employees inflated wages because e.g. government buys new windows hardware at inflated prices. Government can afford those inflated prices because a. the global south governments pay them yearly debt repayments or b. because they tax superprofit made in the global south.

        • hotcouchguy [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok, that’s starting to make sense. Still not sure about it, but I feel like I’m understanding it at least a little better. Definitely interested to read the book now, thanks for all the info