ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 year agoIsrael warlocksh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11.13Kfile-text
arrow-up11.13KimageIsrael warlocksh.itjust.worksModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 year agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecron@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 year agoNo. Your fallacy would apply to something like 80 percent of Americans believe that … But not to Judges from all over the world came to the conclusion … The whole thing this fallacy is trying to explain is that you should ask the experts, not the general population.
minus-squareSulaymanF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·edit-21 year agoDid anyone claim that all judges are correct? No. You’re strawmanning the issue. Going from one incorrect fallacy to another. And who do YOU think should best be qualified to determine whether a law is broken or not…except a judge? Or the consensus of judges?
minus-squarecron@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoI have absolutely no idea what aileen cannon has to to with the fallacy you mentioned. Maybe you posted your reply to the wrong thread.
No.
Your fallacy would apply to something like
But not to
The whole thing this fallacy is trying to explain is that you should ask the experts, not the general population.
deleted by creator
Did anyone claim that all judges are correct? No. You’re strawmanning the issue. Going from one incorrect fallacy to another.
And who do YOU think should best be qualified to determine whether a law is broken or not…except a judge? Or the consensus of judges?
deleted by creator
I have absolutely no idea what aileen cannon has to to with the fallacy you mentioned. Maybe you posted your reply to the wrong thread.