as I stated in a different thread, the issue with the article is its low-information with a lot of nebulous “scary” words and obvious political biases. the parent site is even worse (imho).
take from the article what you will, but it offers no attempt at clarification and is instead basically a very poor opinion piece masquerading as news.
a clearly biased story from a clearly biased site. be careful out there, people.
Feels like the old days of reddit and imgur when sketchy news sites were commonly posted
Are you thinking the quotes are not correctly attributed?
no clue on the quotes.
as I stated in a different thread, the issue with the article is its low-information with a lot of nebulous “scary” words and obvious political biases. the parent site is even worse (imho).
take from the article what you will, but it offers no attempt at clarification and is instead basically a very poor opinion piece masquerading as news.
thats my take. yours may be different.