Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前Come and take itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up11.14K
arrow-up11.14KimageCome and take itlemmy.worldSubstance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前message-square250fedilink
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army. As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
minus-squareTb0n3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army.
As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
Why not both?
Removed by mod