Black Myth: Wukong developer Game Science is reportedly trying to ban content creators from discussing certain topics in exchange for game codes.

In a leaked document, which at least one content creator has publicly stated they received from Game Science, there is a “do’s and dont’s” section, telling those who receive a code what they cannot discuss in their content. Here, the document informs those with Black Myth: Wukong codes that they cannot include “politics” and “feminist propaganda” in their coverage of the game, among other topics.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Why did they forbid talking about stuff that isn’t about the game? Why do they need to talk about this stuff?

        The game studio brought this up, not the reviewers. The reviewers are just pointing out that the devs are clearly woke obsessed piss babies that can’t not talk about politics, even when it doesn’t have anything to do with their game.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why do they feel the need to forbid that speech if it isn’t related to the game. If the content of the game inspires people to discuss such issues then they should be allowed to discuss them. If it’s extremely misogynistic, they should be allowed to point that out.

      • Vittelius@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because I am a believer in death of the author. That means that a developer doesn’t get to decide what their game is or isn’t about.

        A dev could have put in a theme unintentionally. Does that mean you are not allowed to talk about it?

        Why do they get to decide what a work of art means to me?

    • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the same document forbade reviewers from talking about, say, white replacement (which I don’t personally believe btw, just trying to hold up a mirror, here), I’m sure you wouldn’t be crying censorship.

      • Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a really stupid hypothetical because why would a Chinese company give the first shit about “white replacement”?

        And the devil has enough advocates.